Answer:
![x =10](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%20%3D10)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
![AB = 12](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=AB%20%3D%2012)
![BC = 18](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=BC%20%3D%2018)
![AC = 3x](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=AC%20%3D%203x)
Required
Solve for x
Since B is in between both points, then:
![AC = AB + BC](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=AC%20%3D%20AB%20%2B%20BC)
This gives
![3x = 12 + 18](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3x%20%3D%2012%20%2B%2018)
![3x = 30](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3x%20%3D%2030)
Divide by 3
![x =10](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=x%20%3D10)
so you have a 148+85+85=318, 360-318=42 is the measure of angle T because all four angles together make 360
Answer:
15<em>y</em> = -28 <em>x</em> + 205.
Step-by-step explanation:
Slope intercept form of equation is <em>y = mx + c</em> where m is slope and c is the y intercept.
Now slope of line passing through points (-5, 23) and (10, -5):
![m = \frac{y_{2} - y_{1} }{x_{2} - x_{1} } = \frac{-5 -23}{10 + 5} = \frac{-28}{15}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=m%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7By_%7B2%7D%20-%20y_%7B1%7D%20%7D%7Bx_%7B2%7D%20-%20x_%7B1%7D%20%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B-5%20-23%7D%7B10%20%2B%205%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B-28%7D%7B15%7D)
Now equation of line:
<em> y = mx + c</em>
substituting the value of m in above expression,
![y = -\frac{28}{15} x + c](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=y%20%3D%20-%5Cfrac%7B28%7D%7B15%7D%20x%20%2B%20c)
Now, since the line is passing through the point (-5, 23) therefore, x = -5 and y = 23. By substituting these values in above equation,
![23 = -\frac{28}{15} \times (-5) + c](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=23%20%3D%20-%5Cfrac%7B28%7D%7B15%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%28-5%29%20%2B%20c)
![23 = \frac{28}{3} + c](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=23%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B28%7D%7B3%7D%20%2B%20c)
![c = 23 - \frac{28}{3} = \frac{69 - 28}{3} = \frac{41}{3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=c%20%3D%2023%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B28%7D%7B3%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B69%20-%2028%7D%7B3%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B41%7D%7B3%7D)
So equation of line in slope intercept form:
Further solving,
15<em>y</em> = -28 <em>x</em> + 205.
I added 40 and 120 to get 160. i devided 160 by the 6.25 she earned and got 25.6. then i rounded up to 26 hours which is the least amount of hours she could’ve worked.
That is a 4 out of 10 chance that the second number is odd, as well as the first.