The answer is B, extensive research of an individual organism over many years.
Explanation:
The question is asking, what best describes Darwin's studies that led to the theory of evolution, it would be a lot of research over a long period of time. Think, if you were to do a school project, would you get your best results over a short or long period of time with little or a lot of evidence/research? So, B is the best answer, I believe.
Decomposers can break down any dead organic matter. Since any of the organic matter consume can come from any level, there isn't a specific place for decomposers. It is hard to place them because as you travel up the food pyramid energy is lost. Decomposers would have their own level because of this.
<h2>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)</h2>
Explanation:
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a macromolecule acknowledgment innovation dependent on the correlative idea of DNA or DNA/RNA twofold strands.
Chosen DNA strands joined with fluorophore-coupled nucleotides can be utilized as tests to hybridize onto the corresponding groupings in tried cells and tissues and afterward envisioned through a fluorescence magnifying instrument or an imaging framework. This innovation was at first evolved as a physical mapping apparatus to outline qualities inside chromosomes.
