D) Politician and Military General
The PICTA came into force as of 2003 when 6 member countries of the Forum of the Pacific Helases signed and ratified the pact in their different governments. The main objective of PICTA is free trade among the 14 nations that make up the Forum.
In 2006, the PACIFIC AGREEMENT ON THE RELEVANCE OF ECONOMIC RELATIONSHIPS comes into effect, this agreement allows to celebrate free trade agreements between the member countries and an external state, with the following reservation: only Australia and New Zealand will be able to deal directly with external states. The rest of the member countries can only sign a treaty, after consulting Australia and New Zealand. The agreement in general allows all the products produced in the member countries to have the same value and to be sold relatively easily abroad.
Answer:
c. the use of deadly force to prevent the escape of all felony suspects was constitutionally unreasonable
Explanation:
The supreme Court in Tennessee versus Garner held that the fourth amendment stops the police from using deadly force to stop a suspect from fleeing, except in a situation where these officers believe that the suspect has a weapon and could use it on them or on others. that is, in a situation where the suspect becomes a threat to life of the policemen or the life of others.
Answer:
Yes, it is worth having many surveillance cameras in order to provide more safety even if it meant my privacy will be affected.
Explanation:
The world is constantly changing and advancing, thus people around the world are becoming more skillful and technologically-advanced. This follows too that criminals are also becoming skillful in doing illegal activities. In order to prevent crimes from increasing, surveillance cameras should be set up in order to ward them off from doing the crime or to handle a speedy investigation of illegal activities.
Yes, privacy is also essential for me, but weighing the advantages of surveillance cameras is pivotal in ensuring that the society we're living is safe. "Privacy" would be nothing if I'd feel less safer living on Earth.
People tend to assume that men whose faces are wide and short are more likely to be <u>prejudiced </u>than those whose faces are narrower and taller.
When someone is treated differently based only on how they show themselves, it is known as appearance-based discrimination. This leads to an imbalance between how someone is rated based on their performance and how they seem.
Appearance-based discrimination frequently takes the form of a superior who treats a worker differently because they are drawn to them physically. Or perhaps it involves a more tomboy-like female employee getting passed over for a promotion because they don't fit the stereotype of what a woman should look like.
To learn more about discrimination refer
brainly.com/question/14896067
#SPJ4
