Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
Current yield=5.74%
Explanation:
Calculation for the current yield for these bonds
Current yield = (.055× $2,000)/$1,917.12
Current yield =$110/$1,917.12
Current yield=0.0574*100
Current yield=5.74%
Therefore the current yield for these bonds will be 5.74%
In this case the perfect tender rule
b. does not apply.
Explanation:
The perfect tender rule has certain exceptions where it cannot be applied to the tender parties and the probates of the tender.
If there is a government ruling against the use of certain products that are necessary for the tender to be completed and the outlaw happens after the tender is signed but before it is completed as a consignment then it cannot be done.
This would come under the ambit of an emergency where the governed ruling makes such deals null and void.
Answer:
This equals $12,256.70 (230 x $50.70 + 230 x $2.59)
Explanation:
The value of the portfolio on May 3 is the sum of the market value of the shares plus the sum of the returns in form of dividends to be received.
This value adds the weight of the investment obtained by multiplying the total shares held with its market price to the expected dividend returns on the given date.
In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court ruled that rail companies D. states could not restrict trade within their jurisdictions.
Under the constitution, rail companies have the electricity to make all laws that shall be vital and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers. Aaron Ogden was given permission to function his steamboats in the big apple. Thomas Gibbons changed and allowed to function his steamboats in the big apple.
The ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden asserted Congress's authority to adjust interstate trade on the idea of the Supremacy Clause. It set a precedent that Congress had the strength to overturn country rules if interstate commerce were worried.
The case introduced mild the problem of the trade Clause of the united states charter. It changed into a question of whether or not Congress ought to adjust positive factors of trade. It averted states from establishing similar monopolistic rail companies' legal guidelines, encouraging an increase in steamboat journey and cargo delivery. This increased change opportunities between states, boosting states' economies.
Learn more about rail companies here:-brainly.com/question/11433327
#SPJ4