1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kari74 [83]
3 years ago
14

Gabriel Tarde formulated his theory of criminal behavior in terms of _____, principles that governed the process by which people

became criminals.
Social Studies
1 answer:
LenaWriter [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Law of imitation

Explanation:

 Gabriel Tarde studies of criminal behaviour identify 3 types of repetitive patterns. He observed that men imitate one another in proportion as they are in close contact.

The laws of imitation apply to criminals and committing crime just as all aspects of social life that are present in the works of Gabriel Tarde.

According to him, the laws of imitation are universal laws for all social activities either by opposition, imitation or adaptation.

In the case of crimes, the social cohesiveness created among those groups, their beliefs and influence of social environment are very significant factors that influence criminal behaviour.

The social environment will always play a key role in producing criminals

You might be interested in
How does the neighborhood one calls home affect a poor person's life chances? how does the study "moving to opportunity" add to
kumpel [21]

This neighborhood we call home affects poor people´s life because it changes the point of view of a poor person about what is home for him or her. This person realized that there are another ways to live in this world and that some of them are really difficult for him or her to achieve. This can influence him or her in different ways like, it can motivate him or her to work harder and try his or her best so as to modify his meaning of home and get another one that may be better for him or her. It can also not motivate him or her and make this person feel like he or she has no way to get to our lifestyle and make her or him stalledwhere they are.

The study "Moving to Opportunity" adds to our understanding of poverty that we have a different meaning of poverty than other people. For example for some people being poor is not to get to pay the bills, or have no home or not being ableto buy food for their family. But for other people being poor is not being able to afford a holidays trip, or not buying the newest car or not getting the newest cellphone. Every person lives a different reality and has different ways to get to their objectives, but what we need to know is that sometimes we get worried about not getting the last cellphone or the last house or car on the market while some people are worried about how the are going to get a home for their family and how are they going to bring food to their tables. The luxuries and the material things are not always the most important in our life and we have to appreciate what we have and take care of it.

3 0
3 years ago
1. Define accrue, congregant, First Amendment
agasfer [191]
Accrue: Increasing over time.

Congregant: I member of a church or club.

First Amendment: freedom of speech, freedom of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
4 0
3 years ago
It is illegal to pass if you are closer to an intersection or railroad crossing than
Firdavs [7]

Answer:

100 feet

Explanation:

It is illegal to pass if you are closer to an intersection or railroad crossing than

<u>100 feet</u>.

6 0
3 years ago
Sabrina stated there was a _____ correlation between food intake and weight as the scores tended to rise and fall together.
MariettaO [177]

Answer:Positive correlation

Explanation:

What Is Positive Correlation?

Positive correlation refers to a relationship that exist between two variables in such that they tend to move towards the same direction, in such that one one variable increases the other also increases and also when the other variable decreases the other one also decreases.

Statistically a great positive correlation is shown by a coefficient value of +1.0, whereas when there is no correlation that is shown by 0 and perfect inverse is shown by -1.0 coefficient. The vital thing to take note of is that this doesn't mean causation , which means it doesn't mean that the other variable is the direct cause of changes in the other variable. Positive correlation just means the two variables tend to behave the same way percentage and direction wise. For example this can be seen when teh price of the product is changed like when the demand increases the price also rises.

When people increase their food intake their weight scores tend to increase and when they decrease their food intake their weight scores tend to decrease however we know there are so many things that can increase weight gain not food itself but these two tends to move towards the same direction and percentage.

6 0
3 years ago
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A statute that prohibits "an assembly of five or more persons whose common object is to commit an unlawful act, or a lawful act
    14·1 answer
  • The pima and hopi were part of which culture
    12·1 answer
  • Manuel is a sociologist in Guatemala. He is doing research on race relations. His primary interest is the relations of the origi
    6·1 answer
  • How might the distribution of power change in our form of government?
    10·1 answer
  • Why do you think the city flourished even after the death of lAexander?
    10·1 answer
  • What are advantages and disadvantages of living near wetlands
    7·1 answer
  • Some thought that Jackson's action of firing all of the employees and replacing them with his own supporters to be extreme. What
    14·1 answer
  • For dunkin donuts -Economics
    13·2 answers
  • What was the native language of the Incan people ?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following chemicals does the body use as both a hormone and neurotransmitter?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!