1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IceJOKER [234]
3 years ago
14

Do you think states should have the right to nullify, or ignore laws the

History
1 answer:
navik [9.2K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

No

Explanation: Because a state itself in not an independent country. It is part of the United States and inevitably have to follow the federal laws given that the government had already agreed on the law as reasonable. It would also be extremely easy for the country to collapse due to the abuse of nullification.

You might be interested in
2 Which effect did the atomic bomb have on the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki A. millions of citizens contracted radiation poi
vlabodo [156]

2 B. Please comment if I am wrong!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Union forces decide to attack in their effort to demoralize the South after 1863?
melomori [17]
Military and civilian targets
4 0
3 years ago
This type of state completely surrounds another smaller state ?
Annette [7]

Answer:

C) Perforated state

Explanation:

A perforated state is a state that completely surrounds another another country, or nation! The surrounded country is called the enclave, and is generally heavily dependent and vulnerable to the perforated state.

6 0
3 years ago
What led to the establishment of the state of Israel
puteri [66]
Mostly, after WWI, Britain promised them their current stretch of land in the Middle East. While Britain did not deliver, this did give them their claims, and their holdings were secured in WWII and further legitimized in the current war on terror.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did settlers believe that the right to take possession of western lands and use them as they saw was an essential part of am
meriva
The settlers saw the right to take possession of western lands and use them as they saw fitting as an essential element of American freedom. Settlers paid no attention to Indian land titles and admonished the government to set a low price on public land or give it away and regularly occupied land to which they had no legal title. Numerous settlers are also concerned unregulated population of lands west of Appalachian Mountains would aggravate constant warfare with Indians and viewed frontier settlers as disorganized and lacking reverence for authority.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify and briefly explain ONE economic impact Islamic traders had on Sub-Saharan Africa.
    6·1 answer
  • What were the Black Codes? List at least 4 things that they prevented blacks from doing.
    6·1 answer
  • How did Japan’s rise to power differ from Germany Italy and the Soviet unions?
    12·1 answer
  • Until 1971, states could maintain that women were not legally "persons" based on which supreme court decision? in re lockwood in
    15·1 answer
  • Before 1945 Vietnam was controlled by what country? *
    11·1 answer
  • What is the MOST important effect of the discovery of rubber?
    12·1 answer
  • Generals Grant and Sherman provided very lenient terms of surrender to the Confederate forces of Lee and Johnston in order to:__
    6·1 answer
  • Identify at least three events that support this statement: "The ‘Long Parliament' presided over the greatest political revoluti
    10·1 answer
  • How were the Seminole able to resist relocation?
    11·1 answer
  • What was Alexander Hamilton's role in the
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!