Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming there is a punitive removal of one point for an incorrect response.
Five undiscernable choices: 20% chance of guessing correctly -- Expectation: 0.20*(1) + 0.80*(-1) = -0.60
Four undiscernable choices: 25% chance of guessing correctly -- Expectation: 0.25*(1) + 0.75*(-1) = -0.50
I'll use 0.33 as an approzimation for 1/3
Three undiscernable choices: 33% chance of guessing correctly -- Expectation: 0.33*(1) + 0.67*(-1) = -0.33 <== The approximation is a little ugly.
Two undiscernable choices: 50% chance of guessing correctly -- Expectation: 0.50*(1) + 0.50*(-1) = 0.00
And thus we see that only if you can remove three is guessing neutral. There is no time when guessing is advantageous.
One Correct Answer: 100% chance of guessing correctly -- Expectation: 1.00*(1) + 0.00*(-1) = 1.00
Answer:
1/64
Step-by-step explanation:
1) In this study, the control group is the first group of 310 subjects that were instructed to take only 600 mg daily of vitamin C. (Option C; that is, group 1).
2) The study is not Blind (Option C).
In an experimental setup to test a theory, A control group is the set of experimental participants that the theory to be tested isn't applied upon.
In the case of testing a new treatment, the control group is the group that the new treatment isn't administered.
For this question, the experiment was set up to test the effectiveness of a combination of vitamin A and vitamin E in treating flu cases rather than using vitamin C alone. Group A is the only group that only the old treatment alone is applied to; group 1 participants received no dosage of the new combination of treatments to be tested involving vitamins A and E, unlike the two other groups.
It is obvious now why the experimental participants of group 1 are the control group.
2) A blind experiment/study is one in which the participants don't know which group they belong to, whether they are in the control group or the other experimental group. Like in this case, if this was a blind study, the participants wouldn't know which group they belonged to or which treatment is administered to them.
A double-blind experiment/study is one in which both the conductors of the experiment and the participants in the experiment wouldn't know which group any participant is in. The conductors wouldn't know which participants were in the control or treatment group and the participants too wouldn't have an idea whether they are in the control or treatment group.
To learn more about the vitamin visit: brainly.com/question/24324739
#SPJ4
This graph is composed of four straight line segments. You'll need to determine the slope, y-intercept and domain for each of them. Look at the first segment, the one on the extreme left. Verify yourself that the slope of this line segment is 1 and that the y-intercept would be 0 if you were to extend this segment all the way to the y-axis. Thus, the rule (formula, equation) for this line segment would be f(x)=1x+0, or just f(x)=x, for (-3,-1). Use a similar approach to write rules for the remaining three line segments.
Present your answer like this:
x, (-3,-1)
f(x) = -1, (-1,0)
one more here
one more here
Answer:
Perimeter = 16x + 16
Area = 40x + 15
Step-by-step explanation:
Perimeter = the sum of all the side lengths
Perimeter = 2(8x+3) + 2(5) = 16x + 6 + 10 = 16x + 16
Area = product of base times height
Area = (8x+3)*5 = 40x + 15
