Answer: $36,000
Explanation:
First calculate the Equivalent Units of Production;
= 21,000 + (3,000 * 40%)
= 21,000 + 1,200
= 22,200 units
Then find the cost of each units.
= Total production cost/ Equivalent units of production
= 666,000/22,200
= $30 per unit
Then the cost of ending Goods in Process Inventory is:
= Equivalent ending process inventory units * cost per unit
= 1,200 * 30
= $36,000
Answer:
Debit Cash Account $12,000
Credit Unearned Revenues Account $12,000
Being advance payment for marketing research services by Anderson
Explanation:
Revenue received before it is earned are reported as liability until it is earned, this is consistent with accrual basis of accounting. when payment for service not yet performed or goods not yet delivered is received, such a payment must not recognized in the period of payment but in the period when that service is preformed or when the goods are delivered.
The treatment for advance payment of income is a debit to cash or bank and a credit to unearned revenues account or income received in advance account.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
TRUE, in the question, the government is going to auction off permits equal to one third of total emissions in the economy (so two-thirds of all emissions must be abated)
however, the firm will buy 100 permits even though thir marginal cost is below $ 15. because here the firm will get a monopoly in holding the permits of one third of total emissions in the economy. this is such a huge benefit for the firm and by acquiring this permits the firm can transfer the permission permits to other firm with high price or they can distribute the permits of emission among the different firms below the size of the emission permits holding firm. thus, even though marginal abatement cost of$8 has a special opportunity to buy 100 permits at a price of $15 per permits, the firm will resort to buy the permits. the power in handling the emission permits and the monopoly getting the firm in holding the permits allow the firm to act as a leader in the economy compared to other firm who don't have the emission permits. thus, the money gain and the authority gaining in emission permit hold the firm to buy the permits even though their marginal cost is below $15
Answer:
A. No, because of NAFTA, you would expect the export of goods to Canada and Mexico to be substantial.
Explanation:
Even though exists a lot of debate surrounding the benefits of NAFTA to the US, trade agreements tend to increase more than proportionally the commercial exchange between parties. In this case, Canada and Mexico are both parts of NAFTA, so being the most important commercial partners of Ohio should not be a surprise.
an example of an I statement would be d: I feel hurt when you ignore me at meetings; it makes me think that you don’t value my opinion.
