Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be through a "mutual understanding," since this was the purpose of the Berlin Conference.
Through his speech, La Follette argued and put forward the message that United States's treatment has not been fair and equal.
<u>Explanation:</u>
On April 4, 1917, two days after President Woodrow Wilson's call for war, La Follette contended in the speech Congress that the United States had not been fair in its treatment of British and German infringement of American impartiality.
A Republican congressperson from a state with an enormous farming and German-American populace, La Follette stressed that the war would occupy consideration from household change endeavors. Be that as it may, even in Wisconsin La Follette met resistance; the state lawmaking body reprimanded him, as did a portion of his long-term dynamic partners. One of them said that he was "of more assistance to the Kaiser than a fourth of a million soldiers." - History Matters.
According to traditional Freudian psychology it's called Projection.
Projection is that process by which an individual projects his or her own unacceptable impulses, attributes or even desires onto others as an ego defense mechanism in order to be able to cope with the feelings of anxiety they produce in him or her.
This process often involves blame shifting
Liberia was not a African Empire, and Belgium had control over modern-day Congo by the 1800s.
