True! During imperialism, many European countries colonized African nations, making them colonies of Europe. So therefore, many present African nations and states were once colonies. Hope this helped, lmk if you need anything else!
Answer: A) Hobbes thought people were innately violent.
<u>Further explanation</u>:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
Answer:1.The pretended power of suspending the laws and dispensing with laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
2.The freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament;
3.by assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws and the execution of laws without consent of Parliament;
4.by levying taxes for the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative as if the same was granted by Parliament
Explanation:
Answer:
Question 1: The flour will disolve in water after its stirred by a spoon.
Question 2: Insoluble substances remain the same in water.
