Words like <em>never, always, everybody, </em>etc. are absolute nouns and adverbs. In argument, these are usually a sign of over-generalization. These words alone cannot be considered as any kind of appeal (emotional, logical or ethical) since these appeals are done depending on how you use these words, not on the meaning of words as stand-alone.
"He exercised while I watch television." because the tenses of the verbs don't match--"exercised" is past tense and "watch" is present.
Dry mixtures = #2
vegetable salad = #1
sifter = #3
sifting = #4
small particle = #5
Answer: If you'd like an answer you might want to consider adding the paragraph that the question relates to.
Explanation:
After reading the paragraph, we can analyze how the sentence helps develop it in the following manner:
- The sentence makes a comparison between the two Walls: the Great Firewall and the Great Wall. It shows that both served a similar purpose: to defend the Chinese government.
Inside a paragraph, different sentences will serve different purposes. They help structure the paragraph so that it effectively conveys the author's message.
The sentence we are analyzing here serves the purpose of comparing two different things - the two Walls in China.
Comparing means finding similarities. What is similar between the two Walls is their purpose of protecting the Chinese government.
Learn more about paragraph structure here:
brainly.com/question/20528066
