The labels society uses to devalue members of certain social groups are social control. techniques and strategies for preventing deviant human behavior in anything.
Description: A social group includes two or more individuals who frequently interact on the idea of mutual expectancies and who percentage a common identification.
As a person, you could belong to many specific types of corporations: a religious group, an ethnic group, your place of business colleague organization, your university class, a sports crew, and so on. those businesses also can be referred to as social groups.
A social group consists of two or extra people who regularly engage on the basis of mutual expectations and who proportion a common identity.
Learn more about social groups here:-brainly.com/question/24452126
#SPJ4
The statement that best describes the <span>Supreme Court's decision in the Brown v. Board of Education case is that it declared the segregated public schools were unconstitutional. It was Board of Education in Topeka, Kansas that lost the case. The correct answer will be D. </span>
It would be forty-seven percent that the federal government's income comes from individual income tax. Other sources of the federal government's income would be payroll taxes that fund the social insurance programs, corporate income tax and others.
The answer would be letter C.
Answer:
Total 6 sample will required.
Explanation:
We know that variable are of two types
1. Independent variable:
Those variable does not depends on the other variables.
1. Dependent variable:
Those variable depends on the other variables.
Ex: f(y)= 23 x + 2
Here x is independent variables and y is dependent variables.
In the given question
One dependent variables have two independent variables.
First IV have two levels and second IV have 3 levels
So the total sample required = 2 x 3 =6
Total 6 sample will required.
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
