The answer is They are fairly inflexible.
Explanation: An Algorithm is nothing more than a recipe that shows step by step the procedures required to solve a task.
More technically, an algorithm is a logical, finite, defined sequence of instructions that must be followed to solve a problem or perform a task.
We use algorithms intuitively and automatically daily when performing common tasks.
Mark Brainliest
A) Earth Day
Answer:
Often, a comparison of one culture to another will reveal obvious differences. But all cultures also share common elements. Cultural universals are patterns or traits that are globally common to all societies. One example of a cultural universal is the family unit: every human society recognizes a family structure that regulates sexual reproduction and the care of children. Even so, how that family unit is defined and how it functions varies. In many Asian cultures, for example, family members from all generations commonly live together in one household.
Answer:
The primary benefit of guaranteeing the right to a jury trial in criminal and civil cases is Option B: All of these
Explanation:
The main benefit of guaranteeing the rights to a jury trial in case of criminal and civil defendants unnecessary. They also have right to lawyer and a right to have an impartial jury. Also, in case of criminal prosecutors, they have a right to know the accusers and what kind of charges are being against them.
This helps in bringing a lot of confidence in the verdict as it is unanimous. Thus, all the statements A, C and D are true. Thus, answer is "All of these".
Answer:
No, it violates antitrust laws
Explanation:
Antitrust law as applicable to Real Estate, is a law that is made to protect stakeholders: buyers, sellers or other parties involved in a potential or actual contract relationship from practices that may be considered as void such as price fixing (often times lowering of prices), rigging of bids, allocation of customers or markets, running of multiple listing services individually or collectively, and group boycotts.
Hence, in this case, this is a case of price-fixing where by two participants on the same side, have agreed to fix a price, in which the 5% may have imposed high prices on consumers. Thus, it is considered illegal, and violates antitrust law.
