Put it through word check to make sure no words are spelled wrong. Make sure you used proper grammar and have a friend or a parent read it to make sure it makes sense to them.
Among the given statements the one which is not the advantages of the North had at the beginning of the Civil War is that they had 7 of the 8 top Generals in the country.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
During the civil war the armies of both South and North participated in the war on three fronts. Both the North and South had their own advantages and disadvantages. The North was under the leadership of Abraham Lincoln and they had more money, more factories, more railroads and a larger standing army.
The disadvantage that the North had from its side was they didn’t have experienced Generals to lead the war. They did not have proper communication, they were placed in an unknown territory and there was no one to boost them up.
The way that the Enlightenment's theories of government viewed the role of government was that government was meant to serve the people, not the other way around.
Because this was a period in which there was a great export of slaves, in addition to the fact that there were great discussions of white men and blacks still fighting for their total freedom.
In general, starting from the history of a large part of these peoples, we can say that there was domestic slavery in Africa, and not a commercial slavery, that is, among several African peoples, the slave was not a commodity, but an arm to more in harvesting, livestock, mining and hunting; an extra warrior in military campaigns.
These African peoples preferred women as slaves, since they were responsible for agriculture and could generate new members for the community. And many of the children born to slave mothers were considered free by the community. The vast majority of African peoples were matrilineal, that is, they organized themselves based on maternal ancestry, starting with the transmission of names and privileges from the mother. In this way, a slave mother could become a political leader in her society, having generated the heir to the local leadership.
In addition, a slave who was faithful to his master could occupy a position of local prestige, including owning his slaves. Thus, not always being a slave was a condition of humiliation and disrespect. Even representing a submission, it was a situation that was often the same as that of other free people.
