Answer:
A. $35.34
B. $8.27
Explanation:
A. Calculation for The amount of OASDI taxes to withhold from Eager's pay
OASDI taxes to withhold =(320 + 250)*6.2%
OASDI taxes to withhold = $570 × 6.2%
OASDI taxes to withhold = $35.34
The amount of OASDI taxes to withhold from Eager's pay is $35.34
B. Calculation for amount of HI taxes to withhold from Eager's pay
HI taxes to withhold=(320 + 250)*1.45%
HI taxes to withhold =$570*1.45%
HI taxes to withhold= $8.27
Therefore The amount of HI taxes to withhold from Eager's pay is $8.27
Answer:
The net cash flows from financing activities is -$45,000
Explanation:
The computation of the net cash flows from financing activities is shown below:
= Additional common stock issued - purchase of treasury stock - dividend paid - long term note payable issued
= $160,000 - $75,000 - $40,000 - $90,000
= -$45,000
The other items which are mentioned in the question have come under the investing activities
Answer:
For example, a trade where the U.S. exports 4,000 refrigerators to Mexico in exchange for 1,800 pairs of shoes would benefit both sides, in the sense that both countries would be able to consume more of both goods than in a world without trade.
<h3>hope it's help you </h3><h3>plz mark as brain list</h3>
Answer: Supplier selection process
Explanation:
Supplier selection process is the scenario where an individual or a company wants to purchase an item and they contact various vendors who do such business, and asking them for prices, details; generally the requirements for the items they want, they now choose out of the various vendors options, that which matches what they want.
Timothy is in the supplier selection process, where he's evaluating every detail from the vendors based on his request, with an option to request from any of them that matches his request.
Answer and Explanation:
There is no copyright infringement here. Savant homes had not taken a copyright protection for the design prior to this time. Also in the case it was found that the design is not in fact a unique design by Savant homes as it is used widely and was common before savant homes used it. And so it was a dummy model for everyone to copy from. Therefore the infringement was considered invalid as there was no ground for savant homes to claim it as am intellectual property