Answer:
The value of x = -13
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the expression

Multiply both sides by 2

simplify

Subtract 1 from both sides

Simplify

Divide both sides by 0.2

Simplify

Therefore, the value of x = -13
The quadratic formula is x= -b +/- √b²-4ac / 2a
In this problem,
a=6
b=4
c=-3
Now, we can plug this into the formula:
x= -4 +/- √4²-(4)(6)(-3) / (2)(6)
x= -4 +/- √16+72 / 12
x= -4 +/- √88 /12
x= -4 +/- 2√22 /12
x= -2 +/- √22 / 6
So,
x= -2 + √22 / 6
x= -2 - √22 / 6
Since the 1/4 of each pizza left :
Which means that :
Pizza 1 = 1/4 pizza Left
Pizza 2 = 1/4 pizza Left
i think there is no error in what's ben saying
To be honest, these answer choices are a bit baffling. The best answer in my opinion would be to do at least two of the three options given below.
- Place a price floor above the equilibrium.
- Decrease imports from other countries.
- Reduce current supply (reduce herd sizes).
Doing that should increase the prices.
Placing a floor above equilibrium will force the equilibrium to move upward, and with the reduce in supply from other countries, demand will shift toward the domestic producers. Without the demand shift, there simply would be an oversupply or surplus of dairy. Either the surplus is thrown away or its simply housed somewhere else (often at taxpayer expense).
---------------
If you place a ceiling below equilibrium, then the price will go down to that ceiling value. That will be the highest price possible. This is the opposite of what the farmers want. It gets even worse when you increase milk imports (since supply goes up leading to further reduced prices). So that rules out choice A.
If you place a ceiling above equilibrium, then nothing happens. The price stays at equilibrium. Nothing too exciting here. This rules out choice B (though I agree with the "decrease imports" portion).
If you set a floor below equilibrium, then nothing happens similar to the last paragraph above. The price stays where it is. We can rule out choice C. Reducing herd sizes will reduce supply so that could maybe increase prices.
I'm not really familiar with the term "arbitrage" so I probably won't be any help here. That seems like an answer choice that is a distraction, but I'm not sure.
Answer:
I believe the answer may be x= 24.5 I'm not certain though
Step-by-step explanation:
The angles inside the triangle must all add up to 180 so we can subtract 80 from 180 to get 98. Now I'm assuming the two undefined angles are equal because of the two angle bisectors that create the second triangle. If I'm correct in assuming that them we can divided 98 by 2 to get 49 which would be the measurement of both bottom angles. Since there's a line bisecting both of them we would then cut that number in half to get 24.5. I hope this helped, I'm not fully certain of this answer though.