Answer:
Trajan is one of Rome's most outstanding emperors and under his rule, the empire reached its peak. He is remembered as a successful soldier-emperor who presided over the greatest military expansion in Roman history, leading the empire to its maximum territorial extent by the time of his death.
Answer:
I think that he or her would be blessed and grateful for what they have today from what they had back then. They would cherish what they have not distroy it.
Explanation:
1. This is a matter of constitutional law, as the reporter is defending her rights as a citizen stated by the Constitution (in this case, her freedom of expression).
2. It is a combination. On the one hand, the case will involve studying the constitution, and what it has to say about the reporter's freedoms. On the other hand, it will require studying the statute that argues that news agencies cannot publish information that can threaten the nation. Finally, case law will likely be relevant if there is a similar precedent in the law.
3. The law that the federal government is presenting is intended to protect the citizen's from threatening information. On the other hand, the law that the reporter is referring to is intended to protect her freedom of expression.
4. If the law to protect citizen's from information did not exist, it could be an obstacle for the effective action of the government. It could also cause panic and animosity among the people. If the law the reporter is defending did not exist, the government would be able to control the press completely.
Answer:
The first answer makes sense but I think it's the second one due to the multiple "Red Scares" that happened throughout history. In these "Red Scares," raids were conducted on people that were suspected of "un-American activity." If I know anything about the US, the place I've lived for a big chunk of my life is that we value our democracy our beliefs, and communism is direct threat to that.
I would have to go with C.
