Question

Sarah was in a meeting where various vendors were being considered. She noticed that one of the vendors had a history of mistreating its own employees, but that vendor was also the one giving the best value for her company’s money. She raised the issue, but was overruled by her colleagues. Therefore, Sarah went ahead with the company’s decision to hire the services of that vendor. Which type of relativism has Sarah experienced here? A. naïve relativism B. cultural relativism C. role relativism D. social relativism
pretty sure it is C. Role relativism

Answer 1

Answer:

C. role relativism

Explanation:

In this relativism the moral fits to the goals of the company so its adjusted to gain the goals set inside the firm regardless personal views.

Answer 2

Answer:

The type of relativism experienced by Sarah is Role relativism.

Option- C.

Explanation:

Role relativism that comes under the types of moral relativism is a case in which, a person has to keep his own personal views and beliefs about something aside and takes a decision which would benefit greatest number of people of the firm instead.

Here, Sarah feels that the service of the vendor who mistreats the employees should not be hired but her peers in the firm overhauls her decision as he also was the one who gives the best value for the company’s money. So, Sarah keeps her views aside and hires the vendor's services.