A development from 1861 to 1865 not directly mentioned in the excerpt to support McPherson historical argument interpretation of the civil war is on the question passed on whether to concentrate on war that killed over a million people or to question whether the war was a necessity. The excerpt supports McPherson's argument that the war was in three forms, first through the mobilization of human and material resources by both sides, secondly, it ended with negotiated peace where victory ranged on one side but destroyed the economy and social systems of the losers. It led to the creation of a new Nation.
Answer:
B. establishes a social hierarchy based on a strict caste system.
Explanation:
The Hinduism social hierarchy is called "Varna". Refers to social classes in Brahminical texts like the Manusmriti.
Brahmins: priests, scholars and teachers.
Kshatriyas: rulers, warriors and administrators.
Vaishyas: agriculturalists and merchants.
Shudras: laborers and service providers.
Answer: I am pretty sure its C
Explanation:
Answer:
#1. The treaty of Paris
#2. Pushed Natives further west
Explanation:
#1. The war provided Great Britian enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the wars expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.
#2. With Britain in control, Native Americans in Ohio feared the colonists would move into their lands, driving the Native further west as had occurred since the earliest British Settlements in North America.
Answer:
I dont know if this is an optional choice question if so this is probabaly wrong on the ABCD scale so you can report this but otherwise if not:
People make up there mind with the knowledge of there own opinions and what <em>is</em><em> </em>factual to them so to change there minds is because it is based on other peoples opinions and this makes sense ( the easiest way to explain it is as if its a filter going through this persons brain and them identifying if this is factual to them or not in <em>their</em> opinion) to them so, after they go through this process of <em>proving</em> this other information that they held so kindly to there truth, <em>wrong</em> this suddenly changes there mind. By what they think is factual enough to believe <em>at least to them. </em><em>It</em><em> </em><em>can</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>diffe</em><em>rent</em><em> </em><em>for</em><em> </em><em>everyone</em><em> </em><em>else</em><em>.</em><em> </em>