Answer:
B) Save her money.
Explanation:
The girl's utility of saving her money = √$15 = $3.87
If the girl starts her lemonade business, the expected utility of her investment = (50% x √$5) + (50% x √$27) = (50% x $2.236) + (50% x $5.196) = $1.118 + $2.598 = 3.72
Since the utility of saving her money ($3.87) is > than the utility obtained by the investment ($3.72), the girl should save her money.
Answer:
a. true
b. false
c. true
d. false
e. true
f. false
g. true
h. true
Explanation:
a. we solve for depreciation
$50,460,000/15
= $3364000
this is true
b. retained earnings have no roles to play in this option. false
c. The long term debt has been sen to chaange by
50460000-16741282
= $33718718
true
d. This is false retained earnings have no role to play here.
e. This is true because this is the amount that was used to purchase the plant
f. false since retained earning has nothing to do here.
g. this is true also. the face value of the bond is $33,718,718.
h. this is true. since palnt and equipment is $5046000
I’m pretty sure it’s d sorry if it’s wrong!
Question Completion with Options:
a. ignore convenience stores in its distribution network.
b. deliver fewer cameras than were needed during a holiday season.
c. miss the customer connection by emphasizing place over convenience.
d. exert too much power in the distribution network.
Answer:
GoPro
production problems forced it to
b. deliver fewer cameras than were needed during a holiday season.
Explanation:
Shortages are avoided by producers as much as possible in order not to cause disequilibrium in the market. Shortages are not the same as scarcity. They are temporary setbacks when the quantity demanded outstrips the quantity supplied at the equilibrium market price. The backlashes result in lost sales and revenue for suppliers. Shortages may clear ways for competitors to enter the market to meet the unsatisfied demand.
Answer:
The correct option is is A, predatory pricing
Explanation:
Predatory pricing is an illegal approach to pricing where a firm fixes a very low price in order to send competitors out of business.
This is very applicable to a firm that has economies of scale where its cost per unit reduces as more and more units are produced, making it possible to undercut competitors without feeling much impact in profitability.
This approach is against the anti-trust law as it paves for a monopoly market,where only one firm operating in the market determines the price which is not likely to be favorable to consumers
