What is 8,147 ÷ 24 with a remainder

What is the slope of the line if the points are (-2,5) and (3,-5)

Tanzania [10]

The slope would be m= -2

7 0

3 years ago

The following 5 questions are based on this information: An economist claims that average weekly food expenditure of households

liq [111]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $\mu_{1}-\mu_{0}\leq 0$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}>0$

$SE=\sqrt{\frac{12.5^2}{35}+\frac{9.25^2}{30}}=2.705$

b) 2.70

$t=\frac{(164-159)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{12.5^2}{35}+\frac{9.25^2}{30}}}=1.850$

b. 1.85

$p_v =P(Z>1.85)=0.032$

b. 0.03

a. We can reject H(0) in favor of H(a)

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

$\bar X_{1}=164$ represent the mean for the sample 1

$\bar X_{2}=159$ represent the mean for the sample 2

$\sigma_{1}=12.5$ represent the population standard deviation for the sample 1

$s_{2}=9.25$ represent the population standard deviation for the sample B2

$n_{1}=35$ sample size selected 1

$n_{2}=30$ sample size selected 2

$\alpha=0.05$ represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.

t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)

State the null and alternative hypotheses.

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the expenditure of households in City 1 is more than that of households in City 2, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu_{1}-\mu_{0}\leq 0$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}>0$

We know the population deviations, so for this case is better apply a z test to compare means, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{(\bar X_{1}-\bar X_{2})-0}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^2_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma^2_{2}}{n_{2}}}}$ (1)

t-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other".

Standard error

The standard error on this case is given by:

$SE=\sqrt{\frac{s^2_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{s^2_{2}}{n_{2}}}$

Replacing the values that we have we got:

$SE=\sqrt{\frac{12.5^2}{35}+\frac{9.25^2}{30}}=2.705$

b. 2.70

Calculate the statistic

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:

$t=\frac{(164-159)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{12.5^2}{35}+\frac{9.25^2}{30}}}=1.850$

P-value

Since is a one side right tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z>1.85)=0.032$

b. 0.03

Conclusion

If we compare the p value and the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

a. We can reject H(0) in favor of H(a)

4 0

3 years ago

Two ice skaters started on opposite ends of a 200-foot-long rink and then skated toward each

SSSSS [86.1K]

Answer:

The proportion that can be used to find x is;

(200-x)/x = 7/6

Step-by-step explanation:

Now, we want to find the proportion which can be used to find x.

From the question, we are told that the father skater traveled 7 ft for every 6 ft of the slower skater;

this means that the ratio of their speed is 7:6

Now, when they passed each other , the slower skater has traveled x ft, what this means is that the faster skater will have traveled a distance of (200-x) ft at that moment they passed each other.

Mathematically, since their time is equal i.e the time they used to pass each other, then, the ratio of their distances is same as the ratio of their speeds;

Hence;

(200-x)/x = 7/6 or x/(200-x) = 6/7

3 0

3 years ago

Solve −6x+6−7=2x+8 for x. How would I solve this?

MakcuM [25]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

−6x+6−7=2x+8

-1-8=2x+6x

8x=-9

x= - $\frac{9}{8}$

7 0

3 years ago

Leah invested $950 in an account paying an interest rate of 1.5% compounded continuously. Assuming no deposits or withdrawals ar

Contact [7]

$\bf ~~~~~~ \textit{Continuously Compounding Interest Earned Amount} \\\\ A=Pe^{rt}\qquad \begin{cases} A=\textit{accumulated amount}\\ P=\textit{original amount deposited}\dotfill & \$950\\ r=rate\to 1.5\%\to \frac{1.5}{100}\dotfill &0.015\\ t=years\dotfill &6 \end{cases} \\\\\\ A=950e^{0.015\cdot 6}\implies A=950e^{0.09}\implies A\approx 1039.5\implies \stackrel{\textit{rounded up}}{A=1040}$

6 0

3 years ago