The answer is B the invention of balance made trade easier
When it returned it to royal control, it was established as a state that had a local assembly which was some type of an early government that was supposed to be more democratic. Eventually it all changed due to historical things in America that we know of.
<span />
1. The document Abbey record was written in the middle of the 9th century. It was written by the monks at Abbey.
The document is about the invasions on the Christians by barbarians and heathens and the troubles that were being caused.
2. This document type is an account of invasions and wars. It was written to discover the pattern of invasions and wars that were happening.
3. This document corroborates the textbook account of A. The reason it matches A is because of the similarity between both. Textbook A is about the lawlessness and turmoil that was persistent in Europe in the dark ages.
4. Yes I think it is a reliable piece of evidence. This is because, the accounts of C already said that the heathen invaded and broke into Christendom. This agrees with the barbarism that was described in A.
Read more on brainly.com/question/18521663?referrer=searchResults
Answer: A) Hobbes thought people were innately violent.
<u>Further explanation</u>:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
