You can take 8,000 and times it by 0.03. your answer is 2,500
Answer:½((n/2) – ½) – ½ = 10
½(n/2) – ¼ - ½ = 10 (using the distributive property)
¼n – ¼ - ½ = 10 (multiplying to eliminate the parentheses)
¼n – ¾ = 10 (combining like terms)
¼n = 10¾ (adding ¾ to both sides of the equation)
n = 43 (dividing both sides of the equation by ¼)
Step-by-step explanation:
Let’s start by writing Josie’s first step as an expression. Dividing n by 2, then subtracting ½ from
the result would be (n/2) – ½. If we build on this expression with the information in Josie’s
second step, we get ½((n/2) – ½) – ½. Knowing the final result is 10, we can set up the equation
below, and solve for n as follows: hope this helps
Answer:
a) 301.6 cm³
b) 188.5 cm²
Step-by-step explanation:
The volume and lateral surface area of the cone can be found using the given dimensions with the given formulas. All that is needed is to substitute the appropriate values and do the arithmetic.
__
<h3>a) volume</h3>
The volume is given by the formula ...
V = 1/3πr²h
The dimensions are given on the diagram: r = 6 cm, h = 8 cm. Using these values in the formula, we find the volume to be ...
V = 1/3π(6 cm)²(8 cm) = 96π cm³ ≈ 301.6 cm³
The volume of the cone is about 301.6 cm³.
__
<h3>b) area</h3>
The lateral area of the cone is given by the formula ...
A = πrl
The dimensions are given on the diagram: r = 6 cm, l = 10 cm (the slant height). Using these values in the formula, we find the area to be ...
A = π(6 cm)(10 cm) = 60π cm² ≈ 188.5 cm²
The area of the curved surface is about 188.5 cm².
The rate of change is 4.A linear model
<em>I am against people doing this.</em>
<em>I think it's wrong because for some reason scientists are permitted to do this but that is breaking the law. I hate how they do it because these are just innocent animals that did nothing wrong to us, our scientists just decide it's ok to go stick needles in them and put stuff on them. My biggest problem with this is that they don't care about the effects their products have on innocent animals and instead of fixing their mistake and just apply it to humans, they just keep on going like there's no tomorrow. Animals have done nothing wrong to these people and I think that it's wrong to do so. Also, I don't really think that this proves anything. An animal's skin and fur are different than a human's skin and hair so it would make no sense to test these things on them because it really is guaranteed to give an accurate answer. Animals differ from us in so many ways that you should be able to think that scientists wouldn't harm these lovely creatures, but instead, they do. Why do scientists hurt these animals? I don't want to live in a world with hurt animals, especially when some of them have World Records, like the Sea Otter.</em>
<em>-R3TR0 Z3R0</em>
