Which method separate modern historians from ancient Greek historian's

1 answer:

6 0

Because direct evidence was so scarce during the time of Ancient Greece, ancient historians had to rely heavily on story telling and embellishment, which that would never be tolerated with a modern historian.

You might be interested in

Pigs do not make good pets. Is fact o opinion

erik [133]

opinion

you can't prove that pigs don't make good pets, its totally subjective

3 0

3 years ago

What was the main issue in the debates between abraham lincoln and stephen a. Douglas in 1858?.

qaws [65]

Answer:

slavery and its influence on American politics and society

Explanation:

6 0

1 year ago

The MAIN reason the United States entered Word War II was?

Nataly_w [17]

I'm pretty sure it's

because Japanese bombed pearl harbor

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the Scientific Revolution change the way people understood the<br> world?

nikdorinn [45]

Transformation in thinking that occurred in the 1500's and 1600's caused by scientific observation, experimentation, and questioning of traditional opinions. It changed the way Europeans looked at the world. What did the Greek astronomer Ptolemy believe? He believed the Earth was the center of the universe.

6 0

2 years ago

Infiere: ¿Qué relación pudo existir entre absolutismo y mercantilismo?

ololo11 [35]

Answer:

La respuesta correcta es "ambas daban poder absoluto al estado".

Explanation:

El absolutismo es un tipo de régimen político característico porque las personas con poder no podían ser juzgadas por ninguna institución, y únicamente podían ser juzgadas por la ley divina. El mercantilismo es una idea político-económica que, al igual que el absolutismo, daba poder absoluto al estado. La diferencia es que el mercantilismo estaba enfocado en la economía de la gente, y dictaba que el estado podría intervenir en cualquier transacción local o extranjera.

6 0

2 years ago