Answer:
The given statement is FALSE.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the original expression is defined for all values of x , then this implies there is no real value of x such that the original expression is not defined.
Hence, the original expression has domain all real values x
Now, the simplified form which is obtained by simplifying the original expression may not have the same domain as the original expression.
So, if original expression is defined on some value of x then it might be possible that the simplified expression may not be defined on that value of x.
So, we need to specify the absolute value in the simplified expression.
Hence the given statement is FALSE.
Answer:
-2
Explanation:
f = -19.8
17.8 + -19.8 (f) = -2
It is a negative 2 so the answer is (7,-2)
Answer:
Yes, you can conclude that ΔJKL ≅ XYZ.
Step-by-step explanation:
I forget how to describe it in geometric terms but, if you read the similarity statement again, and follow each angle, you'll notice that the shapes match, and they correspond to each other, it would be different if it said something like ΔLKJ ≅ XYZ because it does not match.
If you're looking for a specific reason, we'd say that they're congruent because of SAS (Side-Angle-Side)
If this still confuses you, hit me up.
Answer:
For the first page (doesn't show the number), it is the third option.
For the second page (doesn't show the number), it is also the third option.
For the third page or number 15, it is the second option
For the fourth page or number 12, it is the second option
For the fifth page or number 11, it is the second option
Step-by-step explanation:
If this has helped you, please mark as brainliest
