Answer:
OCTAVIAN GETS TO THE POWER After the death of Caesar, the three Socialists fell into the hands of a politician-general belonging to Caesar's circle. One of Antonius Caesar's commanders, Lepldus, was the leader of the cavalry, and the young but more purposeful Octavian was Caesar's nephew, the dictator's official heir, whose uncle took control of the events. Winning the shackles of power, he was among the contenders for power. They conspired to seize power: this was the second triumvirate (43 BC). The following year they defeated the (Philippi, 42 BC) and then divided among themselves the power over the empire: Octavian to the West, Antonius to the East, and Africa to the Republicans. Lepidus soon faded into the background, and then Octavian and Antonius continued to fight each other for monopoly. Another civil war became inevitable. Antonius relied on Hellenistic Egypt. To the last Egyptian queen, VII. Because of his love affair with Cleopatra, many feared that Antonius E would not appreciate Roman tradition and that the center of gravity of the empire would be to the east. For this reason, the majority of the Romans supported Octavian. The decisive clash took place at Actium (31 BC), and Octavian won the naval battle. He became the power.
Answer:
Economists have had an enormous impact on trade policy, and they provide a strong rationale for free trade and for removal of trade barriers. Although the objective of a trade agreement is to liberalize trade, the actual provisions are heavily shaped by domestic and international political realities. The world has changed enormously from the time when David Ricardo proposed the law of comparative advantage, and in recent decades economists have modified their theories to account for trade in factors of production, such as capital and labor, the growth of supply chains that today dominate much of world trade, and the success of neomercantilist countries in achieving rapid growth.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
The word "always" implied that the states should obey the federal government under any circumstances.
Most of the times, yes. I think it is important for the states to obey the federal government in order to maintain law and order in the country.
But, there's a chance that the federal government might impose a legislations that's violates the constitutions or human rights. At that point, the states need to be able to raise as the opposition from the central government.
<span>The growth and development of the Repulican party, as well as the Election of 1856 had a large impact on the American political system during the above time period, just as the impact of slavery was influential. Slavery and anti-immigrant mentalities actually weakened the main political parties and allowed for the emergence of the Republican party during this time. This party formed in the midwest and in some regions in the north.</span>
Answer:
Well I can eliminate the last one right, why would they want to lose money? I’d say it’s the 3rd one because who had more say on what happens with their company? If it’s incorrect I’ll straight up delete this unlike a lot of other people.
