Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Solving an inequality is similar to solving an equation. To solve for r, isolate it. Whatever you do to one side, do to the other. Remember that a negative and a negative equal a positive, thus one side of the inequality becomes r + 5. Then, subtract both sides by -5 to find the answer.
Well... to solve use rise over run... that is to find the slope,
now to find the y-intercept you look at what coordinate crosses the y-axis.
y= (what you got for the slope Ex. 1/2)x + (the y-intercept)
Figure it out and you got the answer with just a bit of help!!!
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Graph A
Step-by-step explanation:
I had this question in my class and got it right with answer A :')
Answer:
Demetrius's account is $84 higher after the two transactions
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
x -----> original amount in Demetrius's account
y ----> amount in Demetrius's account after the deposit and the withdraws
we know that
The amount in Demetrius's account after the two transactions must be equal to the original amount in Demetrius's account plus the deposit minus the withdraws
so
therefore
Demetrius's account is $84 higher after the two transactions
Its an indirect proof, so 3 steps :-
1) you start with the opposite of wat u need to prove
2) arrive at a contradiction
3) concludeReport · 29/6/2015261
since you wanto prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', you start wid the opposite of above statement, like below :- step1 : Since we want to prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', lets start by assuming the opposite, that the diagonals of parallelogram dont bisect each other.Report · 29/6/2015261
Since, we assumed that the diagonals dont bisect each other,
OC≠OA
OD≠OBReport · 29/6/2015261
Since, OC≠OA, △OAD is not congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
∠AOD≅∠BOC as they are vertical angles,
∠OAD≅∠OCB they are alternate interior angles
AD≅BC, by definition of parallelogram
so, by AAS, △OAD is congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
But, thats a contradiction as we have previously established that those triangles are congruentReport · 29/6/2015261
step3 :
since we arrived at a contradiction, our assumption is wrong. so, the opposite of our assumption must be correct. so diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other.
