From the excerpt, I conclude that the Maya forefathers believed it was the fate of animals to be hunted and eaten. The key segment of this text is "Accept your destiny. Your flesh shall be torn to pieces." The forefathers mention they have changed their mind because animals were not able to adore or obey them.
Because animals cannot adore their creators, "there shall be those" who will be able to do all of this. These "others" are the humans, who will hunt and eat animals. Animals will then have to accept their destiny and "be changed," being sent to the ravines and the woods.
I think that the most reasonable conclusion is answer D.
The correct answer is letter A.
Explanation: Educational Psychology is a branch of Psychology focused on the teaching-learning process. It aims to improve this mechanism, both from the institution and student point of view. The work involves educational strategies, observation or functioning of the educational institution as a whole.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Former colonies threw off many aspects of colonial rule, but they have kept the essential elements of the state. New states in former colonies were fundamentally different than the experiences of older states in that <em>the new states were trying to develop state institutions with not as much resources than previous states did and in less time.</em>
For instance, the first example was the House of Burgesses in the colony of Virginia. It was the first intent of Virginians to have their own legislative body to create its own laws, trying to get some independence from the British monarchy.
<span>Italian forces quickly surrendered</span>
<span>A natural monopoly is a type of monopoly that exists as a result of the high fixed costs or startup costs of operating a business in a specific industry. Additionally, natural monopolies can arise in industries that require unique raw materials, technology or other similar factors to operate.</span>