<h2>The given statement is true.</h2>
Explanation:
Points and sub points help the readers to,
- Understand it clear
- Better clarity
- Reader-friendly
As per the given statement in the question, it is mandatory to have two or more points as sub points.
Reason:
We go for elaborating with sub points for the reason that
- it needs more briefing in points
- Need to talk variety of details
- To convey depth of content in simple way
- Depth indicates that the pointers will be more than 2 items
So if the pointers are lesser than two, then it is enough the content is delivered as a single statement than in points.
Answer:
The current price of the stock is $93.036
Explanation:
The zero growth dividend model provided by the DDM will be used here to calculate the value of stock today. The stock's dividedn are just like a perpetuity. The value or pirce of a perpetuity is,
P0 = D / r
Where,
D is the dividend
r is the required rate of return
P0 = 3.34 / 0.0359
P0 = $93.036
Answer:
b. Credit to Fair value adjustment for $5,000.
Explanation:
Particulars Amount
Beginning balance of fair value adjustment $20,000
Less: Unrealized gain on Dec 31 <u>$15,000</u>
(515,000 - 500,000)
Credit to fair value adjustment <u>$5,000</u>
Here the answer I don't feel like I use the word quotient right on the last part.
Answer:
B) that the impact of unethical actions can reach far beyond the corporation.
Explanation:
Due to Bernie's bad actions, not only did WorldCom's shareholders, clients and employees suffered, also an innocent third party suffered. The Heritage Foundation had nothing to do with Bernie (unlucky name for CEOs), but since they received money from the Sea Pines Heritage PGA golf tournament, both the foundation and the tournament will suffer from lower incomes and bad reputation. This can almost be consider a negative externality, since an innocent bystander suffers from the crooked transactions of other parties.