Most people criticize monopolies for charging excessive prices, but economists disagree because monopolies do not produce enough goods and services to be allocatively efficient.
What is Allocative efficiency?
Efficiency, whether allocational or allocative, is the quality of a market where all products and services are efficiently divided among consumers in an economy. It happens when parties can use the precise and easily accessible information reflected in the market to decide how to employ their resources.
Why is a monopoly allocatively inefficient?
Companies with monopoly power can set prices higher than in a market with competitors. Because in monopolies the price is higher than MC, an unregulated monopoly provider is very likely to be allocatively inefficient. In a market where there is competition, prices would be reduced and more people would benefit from buying the product.
Learn more about Allocative efficiency: brainly.com/question/23879464
#SPJ4
Happy to help!
The correct statement includes the word: management.
Public relations is best considered a management function.
I hope I have successfully assisted you. Let me know if you have any questions!
~Brooke❤️
The increase in the minimum wage in the economy would cause employers to increase charges that they give to consumers by about 4 percent.
<h3>What is the impact of minimum wage on goods?</h3>
When minimum wage is raised in the economy, it means that the employers of labor would have to pay more operational cost for labor.
The effect that this would have on goods is that the people that consume the goods would have to pay extra for them.
Based on research, an increase in minimum wage raises prices by 4 percent in the economy.
Read more on minimum wage here:brainly.com/question/1461885
Answer:
Under government bankruptcy laws of the United States, anybody can declare financial insolvency in order to look for help from leasers. In any case, this comes to the detriment of harming one's financial assessments for quite a while (now and then upto a multi year time span) alongside bringing about critical lawful,, procedural and court charges.
That being stated, liquidations are significantly troublesome procedures essentially in light of the fact that loan bosses would not need any account holder to take the easy way off in the event that the indebted person wouldn't like to restitution. This is considerably progressively evident if there should be an occurrence of understudy advances where the borrower (Kay for this situation) needs to demonstrate without sensible uncertainty that he/she would confront "undue hardship" in the event that he/she were to continue with credit reimbursements. The "undue hardship" demonstrating part is available to an assortment of understandings, rounds of questioning and lawful examination by the courtroom. Most courts use the "Brunner Test" to decide an indebted person's qualification for understudy advance release. The key arrangements of the test are set somewhere around the United States Department of Education's, Federal Student Aid Office as given beneath:
(a) The account holder, in view of his/her present pay and costs, can't keep up a better than average "insignificant" way of life for himself/herself and his/her wards in the event that he/she were to proceed with the advance reimbursements.
(b) Additional conditions demonstrate certain the way that this condition will prevail for a larger part of the residency of the advance reimbursement.
(c) The borrower has taken a stab at reimbursing his/her understudy advance in accordance with some basic honesty up until this point.
In this specific situation, Kay would be in an ideal situation in attempting to get the advance deferred, on the off chance that she declares financial insolvency post changing her activity. This is so on the grounds that her present place of employment pays enough to reimburse her understudy advance and consequently don't meet two of the three Brunner Test models. Exchanging over to the non benefit employment would compromise her present way of life (and most likely that of her wards) and adjusts to the fundamental soul of the "Brunner Test". It would off base be upto her legitimate insight to demonstrate this danger (post work change) to her expectation for everyday comforts before the court and addition an understudy advance waiver.
Gross profit is net sales minus the cost of goods sold. It reveals the amount that a business earns from the sale of its goods and services before the application of additional selling and administrative expenses.
