Walk kids home from school.
Rake leaves for an elderly neighbor.
Mow your neighbor’s lawn.
Offer dog-walking services.
If you know another language, be a translator at parent-teacher conferences.
Babysit during PTA meetings.
Foster a shelter animal.
Take and donate photos during community events.
Donate blood (if you’re at least 17, or 16 with parental consent).
Contact your reps about local issues.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
The Indian Education act of 1972
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question doesn't include options, we can say the following.
Our Senate has finally emerged from weeks of debate with a decided version of the Missouri Compromise. Among its list of provisions, all lands acquired in the Louisiana Purchase that are north of the southern border of Missouri, with the exception of Arkansas, will now be free states, where slavery was prohibited. On the other hand, the states south this border would be slavery states, where people could own slaves.
In 1820, the Missouri Compromise represented an agreement between north and southern states of the Union about the situation of the western territories recently acquired. The negotiations were based on the authorization of slavery in these territories. The decision was that Missouri was going to enter the Union as a slave state, meanwhile, Maine entered as a free state.
Hi there!
The principle of SOCIAL CONFORMITY.
It showed that people tend to engage behaviours more likely in confirmation of the society at large.
The interesting question is when everybody is thinking about confirming then who decide what behavior to engage in, from the start? That is if we are supposed to DRINK in a Social gathering when all are drinking. Then who thought that Drinking is to be done by all, or who sets the social norm and how is the degree of strictness understood and enforced?
is it something we just think and that the norms doesn't actually exist?
Some food for thought!
hope it make sense!
