The Royal Proclamation of 1763
Answer: Charles Edgar Duryea
In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
Africa, and fighting the British in the south....
Answer:
the treaty placed a LOT of blame on Germany.
Explanation:
this made them very angry, and because of the unfairness of it, other countries felt a bit guilty. this let Germany get away with things that normally would NOT be allowed. it established a policy of tolerance. This allowed Germany to gain a LOT of power by doing what they wanted, and by this time, it was difficult to stop them without rocking the boat and creating a second world war.
