The Answer to this question would be A
Answer:
I hope this helps
KEEP IN MIND I DON"T KNOW IF I AM 100% RIGHT SO DON'T YELL AT ME IN THE COMMENTS
Explanation:
Answer:
It is known as pluralistic ignorance.
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance occurs in social situations when an individual does not feel free to express their opinion and makes a wrong inference of what their peers think, so they end up accepting the option they believe the group would choose, even if they disagree.
An example would be: Karla is on the bus, and a person sits next to her, she watches the woman and thinks that looks like a kind person and would like to talk with her for a while, but nobody talks with other people on the bus so avoid talking to her.
The spectator effect is an example of pluralistic ignorance; when an emergency occurs, the larger the group that observed the emergency situation, the less likely someone will help. The individual in the group may think that it would not be right to help, or that he/she should not help because surely another person would help.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
The answer is the generalized anxiety disorder. Generalized anxiety disorder is described by extreme and unnecessary worry about certain life events or activities. It is often being persistently apprehensive of life choices and happening and always expecting of worst things to come. The stressor is often unknown, not specified and mostly stressing out about her state of life in general.
Its true
It will never bring development because you will never have an agreement. You need to have the same purpose so you can work together and have some progress. But it can also be wrong because what if you have two teams working on different projects? Your teams have a disagreement, but both are developing different solutions to the same problem. Still developing but with a different idea. It all depends on your perspective.
