1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
makkiz [27]
3 years ago
10

How did the battle of the coral sea impact Japan’s war strategy

History
2 answers:
Korvikt [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

It prevented Japan from attacking Australia.

the Battle of the coral sea, fought during 4–8 May 1942 and it was a major naval battle in the pacific theater of world war 2 between the japanese empire's navy and naval and air forces from the United States and Australia.

vovikov84 [41]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Battle of the Coral Sea was one of the great and important naval battles taking place in the Pacific during World War II. It was the first aircraft carrier battle, when the enemy fleets did not even see for a moment, and all losses were caused to the other side by the Air Force.

Although allied ship losses were evidently greater, they managed to prevent the Japanese landing in Port Moresby and thus a direct threat to Australia. In addition, for the Japanese side, the losses were more painful, being replaced incomparably worse, because two damaged Japanese aircraft carriers could not participate in any operation in the next few months. Moreover, it turned out how short-sighted was the Japanese approach to pilots who were considered to be dispensable. Their frequent sacrifice led to high losses of experienced pilots, which Japan failed to replace quickly enough and signed on the performance of the Air Force in further battles.

You might be interested in
How did the loss of the silk road trigger Portuguese exploration??? Somebody help me ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!
Elanso [62]
A glance at a world map shows that Europe is in fact a small peninsula jutting from the enormous landmass we call "Asia." It was the Greeks who first divided the world into Europe and Asia, with the waters of the Bosporus as the conventional dividing line. Yet the language they spoke originated, like ours, in the vast steppe areas beyond the Caspian. Men of neolithic times, who moved freely from the borders of China to the Atlantic coasts of Europe, would have found the division meaningless.
At the beginning of recorded history, some time in the third millenium BC, one of the Indo-European or Indo-Aryan speaking peoples of these steppelands succeeded in domesticating the horse, revolutionizing warfare and transforming themselves almost overnight into a formidable fighting force. Wave after wave of horse nomads swept across Europe and western Asia, meeting resistance only from the sedentary civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt, which were able to withstand the assault only by adopting chariot warfare - if not mounted cavalry - themselves.

These nomads, speaking closely related languages and sharing a common social organization, were the ancestors of, among others, the Greeks, Romans, Persians, the Indo-Aryan speaking conquerors of India, and of many other lesser-known peoples who were later to play an important role in the history of the various segments of the Silk Roads.

Time and distance obscured the common geographical and linguistic origin of these widely scattered peoples, and it was not until the 19th century that the relationships among all their languages was fully worked out and their homeland in the Asian steppes identified. When Alexander fought Darius at Gaugamela, he had no notion that the Persians, at least linguistically, were cousins of the Greeks. The Greek and Roman historians who later chronicled his campaigns derived a great deal of dramatic play from the contrast between stern Macedonian virtue and the decadent luxury of the East, between Greek freedom and Persian slavery, between Europe and Asia. These attitudes penetrated deep into the European consciousness - they surface occasionally today - and erected a mental barrier at times almost as impassable as the Pamir Mountains that protected the farthest outposts of China from those the Chinese called "the western barbarians."

For the Chinese, like the Greeks - but perhaps with more reason - divided the world into civilized and barbarian. They, like their counterparts in India, Mesopotamia and Egypt, had had to face the fierce mounted bowmen of the steppes, and to survive had had to adopt their enemies' methods of warfare.

The pattern established in the second millennium BC - the settled, agriculturally-based urban civilizations of China, India and the Middle East regularly exposed to attack by mounted horsemen from Central Asia - did not end with the settling of the Indo-European speaking nomads. As they were transformed, as a result of the success of their own conquests, into urban civilized peoples themselves - Greeks, Romans, Persians and Indians - they in their turn had to defend themselves against new attacks by mounted horsemen from the Eurasian steppes - Parthians, Huns, Turks and finally Mongols. The last great wave of invasion out of Central Asia occurred in the early 15th century of our era, when Tamerlane and his Turkic- and Mongolian-speaking hordes devastated the Middle East.

It is no wonder that Ibn Khaldun, the 14th-century Arab philosopher of history, saw the history of the Middle East in terms of urban peoples periodically assaulted by mounted nomads, who then adopted the civilized ways of the peoples they conquered, became thereby decadent and in their turn submitted to a new wave of nomadic invaders. Had Chinese historians been able to read Ibn Khaldun, they would have found his paradigm borne out by their own experience.

No fully satisfactory explanation has ever been offered for the periodic explosion of nomadic peoples from - or through - Central Asia, but the pattern is clear: The region has historically been a sort of dynamo generating population movements that have affected Europe, Asia and America since the beginning of human occupation of the Eurasian landmass.

The Chinese fear of the peoples to the west was therefore not without foundation. In the third century BC the short-lived but powerful Qin Dynasty linked up a series of earlier bulwarks and formed the Great Wall, effectively separating the settled and cultivated lands of China from the nomadic herdsmen without. The Great Wall stretches from Gansu to Manchuria, a distance of 2,400 kilometers (1,500 miles). It was an effective defence against nomads who lacked both siege
4 0
3 years ago
Appomattox Court House was the site of
frutty [35]
The meeting of Lee and Grant for surrender of the Confederacy
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which element of the u.s government most reflects the constitutional principle of federalism
inysia [295]

The principle of Federalism is most reflected in the US Government & the Constitution's limits on the Federal Government's powers and the reservation of powers for the States. This is set forth clearly in the 10th amendment.

Federalism is evident throughout Government. An example of the US Department of Education. Education is a power reserved to the States and so the US Department of Education funds projects and ensures equity but the power to set curriculums is done by the States.



6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the enlightenment how was it instrumental in american government?
Mrrafil [7]
Simply the Age of Enlightenment inspired the American Revolution that sparked the creation of the American Government.

European politics, philosophy, science and communications were radically reoriented during the course of the “long 18th century” (1685-1815) as part of a movement referred to by its participants as the Age of Reason, or simply the Enlightenment.

Enlightenment philosophers John Locke, Charles Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all developed theories of government in which some or even all the people would govern. These thinkers had a profound effect on the American and French revolutions and the democratic governments that they produced.

The ideas of the French Enlightenment philosophes strongly influenced the American revolutionaries. French intellectuals met in salons like this one to exchange ideas and define their ideals such as liberty, equality, and justice.
3 0
3 years ago
Compare the roles of women in classical era Greece and Persia and discuss some of their rights and activities.
photoshop1234 [79]
yes it’s tht one.....
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did California become during the Mexican War?
    12·2 answers
  • According to the American colonists, who had the right to tax them?
    14·2 answers
  • Which changes occurred during the rule of Abbasids? Select all that apply. Constantinople became the new empire’s capital. Arab
    11·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE ASAP!
    8·1 answer
  • If you mapped the spread of renaissance culture, which urban centers would appear in the region shaded as the origin of the rena
    12·2 answers
  • Someone Help Plz!
    12·2 answers
  • Compare julius caesar with malcolm x
    5·1 answer
  • How did Northern leaders try to encourage Americans to buy goods made in the United States rather than foreign imports?
    13·1 answer
  • name 3 reasons how did Factors contributing to the spread of the bubonic plague! will mark Brainliest
    6·2 answers
  • WILL MARK AS BRAINLIST
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!