Answer: He greatly supported the Confederacy, meaning that Texas joined their side during the Civil War.
Explanation:
After he was elected governor of Texas in 1861, Lubbock took steps to increase Texas' miltary strength. He greatly supported the draft imposed by the Confederacy of able-(white) men, going as far as to oppose or deny conscription excemptions, recomending white cattle ranchers to use slaves in order to free up white workers who could be conscripted and incorporated into the Confederate army. He also set out to build military facilities and factories in Texas to aid in the war effort against the Union. He organized Civil Courts not recognized as legitimate, imprisoning or linching suspected Union supporters in Texas. After the end of his term as governor, he joined the Confederate army as Liutenant Colonel.
This is just a helpful reminder because i haven’t read the book yet but here’s how you can tell what perspective (POV) it is:
(1st perspective uses:
We, us, our,and ourselves are all first-person pronouns. Specifically, they are plural first-person pronouns. Singular first-person pronouns include I, me, my, mine and myself.)
&
(2nd perspective uses:
you (singular and plural personal pronoun)
yours (singular and plural possessive pronoun)
yourself and yourselves (singular and plural reflexive/intensive pronouns))
&
(3rd perspective uses:
he, him, his, himself, she, her, hers, herself, it, its, itself, they, them, their, theirs, and themselves)
New instruments and better methods of travel provided by prince henry's school of navigation
Answer:
Under imperial rule
Explanation:
In this question, we are to select which of the options best describe the leadership style in Haiti in the 1950s
The correct answer here is that Haiti was under imperial rule
When we talk of the 1850s, we mean a period in the 19th century that spanned 1850-1859
During this period, Haiti was an empire.
An empire is like a king-ruled entity but the king here takes the title of an emperor and as such the style of leadership is an imperial one as the emperor would be referred to as the imperial majesty.
Answer:
In my opinion true, because for example one land may be more rich in ore than another. This will cause land one to mine this ore and sell it to other lands who dont have it and vice versa.
Explanation: