Answer:
The frustration-aggression hypothesis
Explanation:
The frustration-aggression hypothesis is a psychological social theory. It explains the origin of aggression from frustration. This hypothesis is used in scapegoat and hate crime. The frustration occurs when the source of the economy gets down. This hypothesis was developed by John Dollar ed at Yale University.
The aggression is always projected on small groups of people which is called the scapegoat. Frustration always leads to aggression in a person. Thus here in the above context when Sam interrupted Paul several times he got frustrated. At last, he turns his frustration into aggression. When Sam enters the room he threatens him for punching on his face and will beat him hard. This is the example of frustration-aggression theory.
Answer:
The concept of sustainable development can be interpreted in many different ways, but at its core is an approach to development that looks to balance different, and often competing, needs against an awareness of the environmental, social and economic limitations we face as a society.
All too often, development is driven by one particular need, without fully considering the wider or future impacts. We are already seeing the damage this kind of approach can cause, from large-scale financial crises caused by irresponsible banking, to changes in global climate resulting from our dependence on fossil fuel-based energy sources. The longer we pursue unsustainable development, the more frequent and severe its consequences are likely to become, which is why we need to take action now.
News<span> of merger talks between book publishers Random House and Penguin ... from the book </span>industry<span>: howls from agents and authors </span>that<span> they'</span>ll have<span> fewer ... </span>will<span> fall; warnings </span>that<span> editors and marketers face huge layoffs; </span>fears that<span> ... the trend toward greater and greater </span>consolidation<span> of mature </span>companies<span>.</span>
The correct answer is decreasing
Explanation: Marriages and all other marital relationships, whether homo or hetero-affective, cannot remain untouched and indissoluble due to the restriction of the law. This would be the same as stifling their breath, removing the air they breathe, preventing their renewal and rejuvenation, sucking their vitality.
