Explanation:
I think it will help you otherwise comment...
Answer:
The Court ruled that the ban on affirmative action in the Michigan Constitution is Constitutional.
Explanation:
The Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action is a case of affirmation, race and sex discrimination in public university admission.
On the 22nd of April, 2014 the court held that fourteenth Amendment's equal protection Clause does not prevent states from enacting bans on affirmation in education.
According to Justice Scalia, '' Constitution [forbids] government discrimination on the basis of race, and state-provided education is no exception''. Justice Scalia believe that the people in Michigan followed the understanding of the clause as their fundamental law.
Other court associate Justice include; Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy and Ruth Badder Ginsburg. The Chief Justice for the case then is John Roberts.
<u>Answer:
</u>
It can be said that the student version exemplifies paraphrasing plagiarism.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The contexts of the texts given above under the titles original source material and student version are clearly the same.
- It can be observed that most words used in both texts are the same but the arrangement of the words is different.
- To retain the meaning of the text but still make the text look different, the formation of the sentences has been made differently using the same words.
- Hence, it can be called an example of paraphrasing plagiarism.
2 cells, 6 chromosomes in each.
