Answer:
caffeine.
Explanation:
When Xi consumed several cups of coffee to stay wake for another hour.Coffee contains caffeine.Since caffeine is psychoactive drug and it is legal also unlike other psychoactive drugs.You feel more energetic.It acts as a central nervous system stimulant and when it reaches the brain it causes alertness and you will feel more awake.But Xi consumed more than he needed hence he was not able to go to sleep.
A 5-year-old child in compensated shock secondary to severe vomiting and diarrhea would be expected to have<u> a slow capillary refill time</u>.
<h3>What is Capillary refill time (CRT)?</h3>
Capillary Refill Time (CRT) is defined as the time required for the color to return to the outer capillary layer after applying pressure for bleaching. It can be measured by holding one hand above heart level and pressing down on the soft pad of one finger. or nail until it turns white, then note how long it takes for the color to return once the pressure is released. In humans, CRTs longer than three seconds indicate peripheral hypoperfusion and may indicate cardiovascular or respiratory dysfunction.
Slow capillary refill indicates Frequent causes of sluggish, delayed or prolonged capillary refill (a refill time >2 seconds) include dehydration, shock, and hypothermia. Shock can be present despite a normal capillary refill time.
To learn more about Capillary Refill Time (CRT) from given link
brainly.com/question/9036823
#SPJ4
The answer is B. Hope this helps!
Answer:
Above Passage does commit a fallacy; specifically, it does commit an appeal to pity fallacy.
Explanation:
The fallacy usually referred to as an appeal to pity refers to the inclination to establish premises that appeal to psychological motivation to get someone to accept a conclusion, distracting the listener from the irrelevance of the premises provided. Mostly, the appeal to pity fallacy tries to convince someone of accepting a conclusion by appealing to something that could provoke pity from the listener, and not to an objective evaluation of the evidence.
In this example, the speaker is trying to make the listener feel guilty for receiving a bonus, appealing to the idea of others struggling with money as a valid reason for such an argument. The idea of others feeling bad about the bonus is not enough reason for the listener to refuse it, but the feeling of guilt could be enough for him to feel forced to do it.
