1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitrij [34]
3 years ago
10

The constitutional principle of checks and balances is exemplified by

Law
2 answers:
Jet001 [13]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: BY THE THREE ARMS OF GOVERNMENT (THE EXECUTIVE,THE LEGISLATURE AND THE JUDICIARY)

Explanation:The three arms of Government are an example of the constitutional principle of checks and balance.

Check and balance is the concept enshrined in the a Democratic Constitution where each of the arms of Government act as a watch for the other arm.

The legislature checkmates the activities of The Executive to prevent abuse of Power they can summon the Executive arm if they discovered any anomally.

The Judiciary have the powers to interpret laws to bring about fairness and justice for both the Executive and legislative arms.

The Executive through the president has the power not to sign bills passed by the legislature if it is not in line with existing laws.etc

LiRa [457]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

your wrong its preident of vito

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The state of Mississippi has 6 electoral votes. If in the next presidential election the
alina1380 [7]

Answer: All 6 will go to the Democratic candidate

Explanation:

Even though there is no Constitutional basis, states usually give all their electoral votes to the candidate with the majority vote in their state. Mississippi is one of those states.

So long as a candidate receives the majority of the votes, they will get all 6 of Mississippi electoral votes. For instance, Senator McCain won 724,597 votes to Obama's 554,662 in 2008 and thus got all 6 electoral votes.

The Democratic candidate here will therefore receive all 6 electoral votes.

5 0
3 years ago
Essay on south korea​
stiks02 [169]

Introduction

Poverty turns persistent when there is great, increasing wealth elsewhere.   According to the human rights theory of liberal individualism, the rich people of any society must have perfect freedom to increase their wealth, and go on increasing it, freedom being “a distinctive feature of the liberal individualist project.”   On the other hand, the theory of communitarianism demands of the rich to respect the human rights of poor people in their quest for greater wealth.  Poor folks are oft described as “oppressed,” and the rich are usually identified as the perpetrators of oppression.   Hence, the practice of liberal individualism by the rich must be considered a moral crisis for society, if in fact the rich have been getting richer at the expense of the poor, as it happens in South Korea.

After all, poverty is known to rob the afflicted of their basic human rights, such as access to clean water, food, shelter, healthcare and acquirement of good quality education.   Such people are described as ‘underprivileged.’  As the following case study of poverty and income inequality shows, even though Asia has a collectivistic culture where communitarianism should be fully applied, whereas liberal individualism is considered a theory applicable in the West alone, the ‘underprivileged’ abound in South Korea.   Had collectivism or communitarianism not been combined with the practice of liberal individualism on the part of the rich and the powerful in South Korea, poverty and income inequality would have been nonexistent.  While it is true that South Korea works to resolve these issues in the spirit of communitarianism, it remains a fact that liberal individualism is practiced by the rich people of South Korea in addit...

6 0
3 years ago
Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade are similar Supreme Court cases in that both cases are based on the
Alik [6]

Answer:

Explanation:

Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade are similar Supreme Court cases in that both cases are based on the

8 0
2 years ago
= D DriversEdcom
Kruka [31]
D is the answer I think
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is Locard’s Principle of Exchange and how does it apply to solving a crime?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

Locard exchange is basically wherever you go you always leave something behind...this can help in a crime scene because it can help identify the suspect

Explanation:

things you can leave via Locard exchange

-hair

-fingerprints

-dead skin cells

-shoe print

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the pros and cons of the department of justice information and databases?
    15·1 answer
  • Similarities between local,state,federal law enforcement
    10·1 answer
  • THE MONKEY'S PAW <br> ESCAPE ROOM code
    5·2 answers
  • Determine if the statement is true or false. The chain of custody document includes information about the location where a piece
    15·2 answers
  • Which government department is in charge of combating computer crimes<br> worldwide?
    13·1 answer
  • The type of analysis that focuses on long-term crime trends is termed
    15·1 answer
  • All of the below statements are true about the intermediate sanctions, except on. Which of the statements below is not true abou
    14·1 answer
  • 7. Shelly is writing an essay about the Bill of Rights. She needs to explain the reasoning for the way amendments limit the gove
    6·2 answers
  • What are some risks of a case failing in court?
    14·2 answers
  • Why is the purpose of self respect and neighboring communities
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!