I believe the answer is Legal standing.
People who had a legal standing are the one that will recieve either harm or benefit after a decision is made.
The amount of involvement that certain parties had in the case will determine how much involvement the party is allowed to influence the case.
Answer:
=> fraction of the portfolio that should be allocated to T-bills = 0.4482 = 44.82%.
=> fraction to equity = 0.5518 = 55.18%.
Explanation:
So, in this question or problem we are given the following parameters or data or information which are; that the utility function is U = E(r) – 0.5 × Aσ2 and the risk-aversion coefficient is A = 4.4.
The fraction of the portfolio that should be allocated to T-bills and its equivalent fraction to equity can be calculated by using the formula below;
The first step is to determine or Calculate the value of fraction to equity.
Hence, the fraction to equity = risk premium/(market standard deviation)^2 - risk aversion.
= 8.10% ÷ [(20.48%)^2 × 3.5 = 0.5518.
Therefore, the value for fraction of the portfolio that should be allocated to T-bills = 1 - fraction to equity = 1 - 0.5518 =0.4482 .
Answer:
The manufacturer will have a c. Loss
Explanation:
The break-even point is the level of production at which the costs of production equal the revenues for a product and calculated by using following formula:
Break-even point in units = Fixed cost/(Selling price per unit-Variable cost per unit) = $50,000/($16-$7) = $50,000/$9 = 5.556 units (rounding)
The manufacturer produces and sells 3,000 units per month < Break-even point in units. Therefore, the manufacturer will have a loss
