Answer: 9 of 13 states had to approve of or ratify a law under the articles of confederation in order for that law to be passed the national government can't obtain any soldiers within the articles of confederation.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is D. the fourth generation of Wilsons would score the highest on a standard IQ test.
Explanation:
The Flynn effect refers to a trend discovered by researcher James Flynn, who after conducting research on the results of IQ tests of several different groups of people all over the world over several decades, found out that there's an increase in IQ scores over time. In other words, younger generations tend to perform better than the previous generations in these intelligence tests. By applying this idea of the Flynn effect to the Wilson family, <u>we would expect that the fourth generation of Wilsons would score the highest on a standard IQ test</u>. Currently, there's no single explanation for the Flynn effect, but researchers point out to environmental factors such as better schooling, better nutrition, improved health, and a social environment that actively stimulates newer generations to improve their performance.
Answer:
<h3>c. mandate.</h3>
Explanation:
A mandate is a command or an order that necessitates an individual or an organization to act in a specific manner. A court may impose mandate to make certain obligations or activities necessary as part of a legal process on certain cases.
Here, judges ordering Massachusetts to change its way of recruiting firefighters, even though the state does not receive aid from the federal government for fire fighting is referred to as mandate. The court necessitates and makes the state follow certain obligations through the provision of mandate.
I believe that it’s a tie between British and Russian that have the least land but I think the answer is British (land in green)
<span>ART BY THOMAS POROSTOCKY</span>PRO: RESEARCH ON GENE EDITING IN HUMANS MUST CONTINUE
By John Harris
<span>John Harris is professor emeritus in science ethics at University of Manchester, U.K., and the author of How to be Good, Oxford University Press 2016.</span>
In February of this year, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority in the United Kingdom approved a request by the Francis Crick Institute in London to modify human embryos using the new gene editing technique CRISPR-Cas9. This is the second time human embryos have been employed in such research, and the first time their use has been sanctioned by a national regulatory authority. The scientists at the Institute hope to cast light on early embryo development—work which may eventually lead to safer and more successful fertility treatments.
The embryos, provided by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, will not be allowed to develop beyond seven days. But in theory—and eventually in practice—CRISPR could be used to modify disease-causing genes in embryos brought to term, removing the faulty script from the genetic code of that person’s future descendants as well. Proponents of such “human germline editing” argue that it could potentially decrease, or even eliminate, the incidence of many serious genetic diseases, reducing human suffering worldwide. Opponents say that modifying human embryos is dangerous and unnatural, and does not take into account the consent of future generations.
