1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Furkat [3]
3 years ago
8

Child development specialists have observed that adolescents who receive large weekly allowances tend to spend money on items co

nsidered frivolous by their parents whereas adolescents who receive small weekly allowances do not. Thus, in order to ensure that their children do not spend money on frivolous items, parents should not give their children large weekly allowances.
Which of the following pieces of information would be most useful in evaluating the validity of the conclusion above?


(A) The average amount of money received by adolescents who receive large weekly allowances

(B) Any differences among parents in the standard used to judge an item as frivolous

(C) The educational background of the child development specialists who made this observation

(D) The difference between the average annual income of families in which the parents give their children large weekly allowances and that of families in which the parents give their children small weekly allowances

(E) The percentage of adolescents who receive no weekly allowance
Social Studies
1 answer:
aleksley [76]3 years ago
7 0
E the percentage of adolescents who receive no weekly
You might be interested in
which economic indicator would be most useful for figuring out how much something you bought today cost ten years ago
love history [14]

Answer: consumer price index

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
What are biggest challenges family law judges face?
Rudik [331]
A family court judge shares her perspective on how domestic abuse cases typically fail or succeed for survivors.
4 0
3 years ago
Bart's friends convinced him to join them in smashing decorative pumpkins early one Halloween evening. Later that night he did n
boyakko [2]

Answer:

Foot-in-the-door phenomenon.    

Explanation:

Foot-in-the-door phenomenon: In psychology, the phenomenon of foot-in-the-door is referred to as the process of making a small request from someone initially to make the person agrees later on for a big request. It gives an idea that if an individual agrees for a small request then he or she might agree for the bigger one as well.

Example: A child request to get a small toy from his or her parents and then, later on, ask for a cycle.

In the question above, Bart's experience best illustrates the foot-in-the-door phenomenon.

8 0
4 years ago
For deep processing to occur, it is best to study information in several smaller sessions than in one long session. Please selec
Kisachek [45]

The statement which states that for deep processing to occur, it is<em> best to study information</em> in several smaller sessions than in <em>one long session </em>is true.

As a result of this, we can see that deep processing has to do with the process of <em>feeding the brain </em>with new information where it stores it in its long term memory so that it can be easily retrieved whenever the need arises.

With this in mind, we can see that the statement is true

Therefore, the correct answer is true

Read more about deep processing here:

brainly.com/question/16044103

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The national environment policy act (nepa) can affect defense acquisition program managers because?
inn [45]

The national environmental policy act (NEPA) can affect defense acquisition program managers because NEPA mandates that environmental impacts be taken into account when making decisions about acquisition programs.

A US environmental law known as the National Environmental Policy Act created the President's Council on Environmental Quality and encourages environmental improvement. It became law on January 1st, 1970.

The fundamental goal of NEPA is to ensure that before taking any significant federal action that has a significant environmental impact, all levels of government properly evaluate the environment. According to the Environment (Protection) Act of 1986, the federal government is empowered to safeguard and enhance environmental quality, manage and lessen pollution from all sources, and forbid or restrict the construction, use, or operation of any industrial facility for reasons related to the environment.

To know more about NEPA refer to:  brainly.com/question/13485563

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where were factories first located
    11·1 answer
  • The head librarian issued a directive that "Absolutely no food or drink are allowed in the library." She issued this directive b
    12·2 answers
  • Analyze What is the biggest problem with using a representative<br> heuristic?
    11·1 answer
  • One of your friends is reading a newspaper article, which notes that, in rats, a positive significant relationship exists betwee
    10·1 answer
  • Which place is located in north Africa (ASAP)<br> Egypt<br> Mesopotamia<br> both<br> neither
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of legislative action
    8·2 answers
  • Read the passages Moon Mission and Laika. What idea is in both passages?
    5·2 answers
  • Which controversial legislation of President John Adams' administration restricted citizens from criticizing the government ?
    13·2 answers
  • Pls help quickly will get brainlyest
    14·1 answer
  • Which is a nonpoint source of pollution?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!