All categories

3 years ago

Consider the market for mobile applications, smartphones, and conventional phones. Each pair are they complements or substitutes

Business

1 answer:

madam [21]3 years ago

5 0

Explanation:

Complements and Substitutes are basically the goods or services. Complements are the goods which are used with one another, and with the increase of price of one good, the demand of other good falls. On the other hand, substitutes are the goods which are used in place of other goods and with the increase in the price of one good, the demand of other product increases.

In this question, Mobile Applications and Smart Phones are Complements, and Smart Phones and Conventional Phones are Substitutes, and Mobile Applications and Conventional Phones are substitutes.

You might be interested in

What is confidential information

dem82 [27]

Answer:

Information that is top secret vip your eyes only

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If a customer buys $10,000 worth of stock in a cash account, then sells the shares for $12,000 without first paying for the buy

katovenus [111]

Answer:

B) II and III.

Explanation:

Based on the information given the statement that are TRUE are II and III

II. The amount of $2,000($10,000-$12,000) which is the profit for the business will be given to the customer but the customer account will have to be frozen or put on hold for 90 days because the customer had not paid for the buy side before selling the shares for the amount of $12,000

III. In a situation where customer paid the amount for the buy side in full either before or after the fifth business day which is the day that follows the trading date, the customer account that had be frozen will be unfrozen or lifted because the buy side amount had be paid in full.

3 0

3 years ago

A profit-maximizing firm will base its decision to hire workers on the additional costs and benefits of each worker. If the extr

tia_tia [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is total revenue; total cost.

Explanation:

Cost reduction is one of the most addressed issues in companies. They do it all the time since it is a permanent process. This is because it always seeks to improve the profitability of the company and, consequently, productivity. In other words, try to "do more with less", which is to produce more with what you have or produce the same with lower expenses. In both cases the objective is to reduce costs.

A company can reduce costs for many reasons: for a drop in sales, for lack of liquidity, for not having access to credit, etc. And when this happens, the cost cut occurs in the areas of human resources with the dismissal of personnel, the restructuring of the purchase processes, changes of suppliers, among other measures.

It is important to know what the current production process is and, if possible, redesign it, seeking to eliminate unnecessary steps, that is, to shorten the production processes. A long production line implies a greater number of workers, more work in the process and more time in product development. It also increases the possibility of errors in the process.

To make the cost reduction in your company even more efficient, you need to know each process deeply to detect unnecessary steps and help you reduce processes and / or procedures that in the medium or long term translate into cost reduction.

8 0

3 years ago

Consider the multi-factor APT with two factors. The risk premiums on the factor 1 and factor 2 portfolios are respectively 5% an

Llana [10]

Answer:

Option (B) 5.5%

Explanation:

Data provided in the question :

Factor Risk premium

Factor 1 5%

Factor 2 3%

Beta of stock A on factor 1 = 1.4

Beta of stock A on factor 2 = 0.5

Expected return = 14%

Now,

Expected return

= Risk free rate + (Beta of factor 1 × Risk premium of factor 1) + (Beta of factor 2 × Risk premium of factor 2)

14% = Risk free rate + (1.4 × 5%) + (0.5 × 3%)

14% = Risk free rate + ( 7% + 1.5% )

Risk free rate = 5.5%

Hence,

Option (B) 5.5%

6 0

3 years ago

Binder Corporation agreed to build a warehouse for a client at an agreed contract price of $4,000,000. Expected (and actual) cos

Rainbow [258]

Answer:

The correct option is a. 2017: $200,000 2018: $520,000 2019: $240,000.

Explanation:

The formula for cost to cost method is expected or actual cost incurred to date divided by the total cost of the project or contract.

Therefore, we have:

Total cost = Cost in 2017 + Cost in 2018 + Cost in 2019 = $640,000 + $1,600,000 + $800,000 = $3,040,000

Cost in 2017 contribution to total cost = Cost in 2017 / Total cost = $640,000 / $3,040,000 = 0.21

Cost in 2018 contribution to total cost = Cost in 2018 / Total cost = $1,600,000 / $3,040,000 = 0.53

Cost in 2019 contribution to total cost = Cost in 2019 / Total cost = $800,000 / $3,040,000 = 0.26

Revenue in 2017 = Cost in 2017 contribution to total cost * Contract price = 0.21 * $4,000,000 = $840,000

Revenue in 2018 = Cost in 2018 contribution to total cost * Contract price = 0.53 * $4,000,000 = $2,120,000

Revenue in 2019 = Cost in 2019 contribution to total cost * Contract price = 0.26 * $4,000,000 = $1,040,000

Therefore, net income for each year 2017 through 2019 using the cost-to-cost method can be computed as follows:

Net income for year 2017 = Revenue in 2017 - Cost in 2017 = $840,000 - $640,000 = $200,000

Net income for year 2018 = Revenue in 2018 - Cost in 2018 = $2,120,000 - $1,600,000 = $520,000

Net income for year 2019 = Revenue in 2019 - Cost in 2019 = $1,040,000 - $800,000 = $240,000

Therefore, the correct option is a. 2017: $200,000 2018: $520,000 2019: $240,000.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers