Jarvis left out a statement from the proof shown.which statement is best explained by the corresponding angles postulate
2 answers:
The postulate of the corresponding angles establishes that when a transversal line cuts two parallel lines, the corresponding angles are congruent. These angles are on the same side of the parallel lines and on the same side of the transversal line.
Then, if we based on this definition and analize the figure attached, we can notice that the angles ∠1 and ∠3 are corresponding angles, so they are congruent. In this case the angle ∠1 is internal and the angle ∠3 is external.
The answer is: ∠1 and ∠3 are congruent (See the image attached).
Then, if we based on this definition and analize the figure attached, we can notice that the angles ∠1 and ∠3 are corresponding angles, so they are congruent. In this case the angle ∠1 is internal and the angle ∠3 is external.
The answer is: ∠1 and ∠3 are congruent (See the image attached).
You might be interested in
Answer:
0.2146
Step-by-step explanation:
From the picture:
The radius of the circle = r. This means that the area of the circle = πr²
Also For the square, the length of the square = 2r, Therefore the area of the square = Length × length = 2r × 2r = 4r²
The area inside the square but outside the circle = Area of square - Area of circle = 4r² - πr² = r²(4 - π) = 0.8584r²
The ratio of the area inside the square but outside the circle to the area of the square = r²(4 - π) / 4r² = (4 - π) / 4 = 1 - π/4 = 0.2146
