No, we can only suppose that the observed distribution deviates from the expected distribution when we reject the null hypothesis.
<h3>What is a null hypothesis?</h3>
The null hypothesis exists as a specific mathematical theory that claims that there exists no statistical relationship and significance between two sets of observed data and estimated phenomena for each set of selected, single observable variables. The null hypothesis can be estimated to define whether or not there exists a relationship between two measured phenomena, which creates it useful. It can let the user comprehend if the outcomes exist as the product of random events or intentional manipulation of a phenomenon.
To learn more about the null hypothesis refer to:
brainly.com/question/13135308
#SPJ4
Answer:
In BOLD.
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = (x - 1)(x + 7)
Convert to vertex form.
= x^2 + 6x - 7
= (x + 3)^2 - 9 - 7
= (x = 3)^2 - 16
So the vertex is at (-3, -16)
Also, as the vertex is a minimum the graph is increasing on interval x > -3.
From the graph we see:
The graph is positive on the interval
where x < -7 and x > 1.
- and negative where
-7 < x < 1.
I think it could be b cause it does have sum solution or it could be A at the same time so try to used the calculator and if it comes up with less then then it could be A if it comes up with more then, then it could be B
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Set builder notation-
It is a notation for representing a set by enumerating its elements and stating the properties that its members must satisfy.
The given set is,
This set is comprised of all negative integers. So symbol Z should be used in this case.
The set builder notation for this set is,
Answer:
(2,2)
Step-by-step explanation:
