1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GalinKa [24]
3 years ago
15

Did the Australian Government have the right in 1987 to propose a UNESCO designation of Ayers Rock/Uluṟu as a natural and geolog

ical site? How and who should mediate the competing interests of Aboriginal people who regard the site as sacred and do not want tourists clambering over ancestors and along songlines (paths connected with stories) with national and international interests in visiting and climbing this unique formation?
History
1 answer:
katovenus [111]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Did the Australian Government have the right in 1987 to propose a UNESCO designation of Ayers Rock/Uluṟu as a natural and geological site?

Yes, it had. It's part of the Australian territory. Indeed, in 1958, had declared as an Aborigen Reserve. It is understandable that the proposal to the UNESCO designation had created some discordance and controversy in that Uluru is a sacred place inhabited by ancestral native people, but the government of Australia has always respected this tribe and its traditions.

Aboriginal people consider the place as sacred. Tourists can visit but they are not allowed to climb the mountain because the Ayers Rock monolith represents a spiritual place according to Uluru's creation story. So the Tourism Department of Australia has shown respect for the aborigen people traditions, culture, and customs, and has established a permanent dialogue to facilitate visits asking tourists to show the kind of respect needed to never mess with the people, traditions, and to produce any affectations to the rock.

You might be interested in
The magma cart was contributed to the
Vanyuwa [196]

Answer:a subject to the law

Explanation: Magna Carta established for the first time the principle that everybody, including the king, was subject to the law.

7 0
3 years ago
Which is a possible side effect that polluted watersheds could have on Virginia's economy? Virginia's fishing docks would likely
Alja [10]

Answer: Virginia's inhabitants would likely need increased health care

Explanation:

The people of Virginia are able to access water due to the large number of watersheds that they have. These watersheds supply them with water for their daily needs and so they are quite reliant on them.

If those water sheds are polluted, the people using it, the Virginians, would therefore be affected by it because their health would suffer. This would lead to them having to incur more health costs in order to stay healthy.

4 0
3 years ago
What is the “positive good” argument of George Fitzhugh?
Dafna1 [17]

Guarantee of livelihoods, support and protection  is the “positive good” argument of George Fitzhugh.

<u>Explanation: </u>

George Fitzhugh was an American social theoretician who released sociological theories based on skin colour and forced labour in the antebellum period. He contended that black "is just an adult child" who requires the economic and social security of slavery.

Fitzhugh continued to argue that slavery was based on faith and that capitalism converted people into slaves for capitalism. There are cannibalistic among capitalists. In the field, Fitzhugh defended slavery not just for African descendants.

He ended with a positive and good comment. Fitzhugh claimed that Southern Slaves had a "freedom, support and protection assurance," and he argued he might be forced to give up his enslaved to a more qualified slaveholder if an owner could not perform his welfare responsibilities.

4 0
3 years ago
What are the major arguments against judicial review?
ad-work [718]

Answer:

Judicial Review is controversial as it has the power to change the laws without the states or federal powers validation.  

The major arguments against it are: first, the power of judicial review is not established explicitly in the constitution.  

The second is that only the states alone are the only ones to have the power to change the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Why did Ottoman sultans create the Janissary?
puteri [66]

Answer:The organization became an important Ottoman military force soon after it was established because the Janissaries were perceived to be the sultan's most trustworthy soldiers as well as disciplined troops with particular small arms skill

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the goals of the delegates attending the first and second continental congress differ?
    5·1 answer
  • Which created a challenge to Soviet control over Poland in 1980?
    9·2 answers
  • Korea is a small East Asian country located on the ______
    8·1 answer
  • 2 Points
    5·1 answer
  • According to Plato, individuals could not achieve a good life unless they did which of the following?
    11·1 answer
  • What body of water that borders USA a Canada to the west is
    14·2 answers
  • Whom did the French and Spanish send to North America to convert Native Americans to Catholicism?
    10·2 answers
  • In article 4, what must be given to each state's public records
    5·1 answer
  • 1. According to Cavour, how can people achieve a degree of<br> intelligence and morality?
    5·1 answer
  • Causes of mfecani war
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!