Answer:
Congress had long struggled to maintain an equal balance between slave and free state. As a result it would take six years for Congress to act on Florida's wish. Congress had to wait until another territory was ready to become a free state.
Explanation:
Answer:
The ONE major difference between Wood’s and Bailyn’s historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelled against the British is:
According to Wood, the American colonies rebelled and revolted out of reasoned principle. They had the mindset that they were "born heirs of freedom" and that freedom is their everyday life. While, according to Bailyn, the colonies rebelled and revolted due to the rise of conspirators who stood against their freedom.
Explanation:
Wood's and Bailey's historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelled against the British can be seen from the excerpt. It's evident that their interpretations differ.
Wood revealed that the Americans didn't rebel due to suffering but due to a "reasoned principle". Whereas, Bailey interpreted it to be that the conspirators against the liberty propelled the revolt.
Answer: The Senate was the most powerful branch of the Roman republic, and senators held the position for life. The executive branch was made up of two consuls, elected yearly. These two consuls had almost kingly powers, and each could veto, or disapprove of the other's decision.
Explanation:
Answer: Republican: Richard Nixon, George H. Bender, James M. Lloyd, Nelson Rockefeller, and Cecil H. Underwood.
Democrat: John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, Stuart Symington, Hubert Humphrey, Wayne Morse, Adlai Stevenson and George Smathers.
Answer:
The French and Indian War changed the relationship between the British and the colonists. As a result of this war, the British got most of France's land east of the Mississippi River. Thus, the British passed the Proclamation of 1763 that prevented the colonists from settling this land.
Explanation:
Hope this helps, if im right brainliest please?!?!