Answer:
The Code of Chivalry was a moral system which went beyond rules of combat and introduced the concept of Chivalrous conduct - qualities idealized by the Medieval knights such as bravery, courtesy, honor and great gallantry toward women. ... The Code of Chivalry was the honor code of the knight.
Answer:
Explanation:
Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase “overall consequences” of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself. For example, if you think that the whole point of morality is (a) to spread happiness and relieve suffering, or (b) to create as much freedom as possible in the world, or (c) to promote the survival of our species, then you accept consequentialism. Although those three views disagree about which kinds of consequences matter, they agree that consequences are all that matters. So, they agree that consequentialism is true. The utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham is a well known example of consequentialism. By contrast, the deontological theories of John Locke and Immanuel Kant are nonconsequentialist.
Consequentialism is controversial. Various nonconsequentialist views are that morality is all about doing one’s duty, respecting rights, obeying nature, obeying God, obeying one’s own heart, actualizing one’s own potential, being reasonable, respecting all people, or not interfering with others—no matter the consequences.
This article describes different versions of consequentialism. It also sketches several of the most popular reasons to believe consequentialism, along with objections to those reasons, and several of the most popular reasons to disbelieve it, along with objections to those reasons.
Switzerland Germany France Netherlands
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The message of Teddy Roosevelt to the congress in 1901 was an indication of his eagerness to use the powers of the constitution of the federal government. The speech dealt with the power of big businesses and the public welfare. He pointed out that an individual contribution or capacity to the Nation that cannot be taken away.
He stated that the fundamentally the welfare of each citizen must rest upon individual thrift and energy, resolution, and intelligence. He stated that growth of entities such as corporations were due to the growth of the country and great industrial centres which resulted in a growth of wealth for individuals as was seen as hurtful to the welfare of the nation by American people.
