<h2>
Answer: <u>
1/4</u></h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Multiply both the numerator and denominator of each fraction by the number that makes its denominator equal to the LCD. This is basically multiplying each fraction by 1.
(912×11)−(24×33)=?
Complete the multiplication and the equation becomes
912−612=?
The two fractions now have like denominators so you can subtract the numerators.
Then:
9−612=312
This fraction can be reduced by dividing both the numerator and denominator by the Greatest Common Factor of 3 and 12 using
GCF(3,12) = 3
3÷312÷3=1/4
Therefore:
912−24=1/4
Answer:
the answer is 0
Step-by-step explanation:
well - 3 plus 3 would just by 0 because if the number with the negative is the biggest then the answer is negative but if the positive number is the biggest then the answer would be positive because there is not a bigger number it would be 0 because 3 and -3 have pretty much the same value other then them being negative and positive
To find the x intercept,plug a zero in for y and solve.
To find the y intercept,plug a zero in for x and solve.
y = 7x + 3
g = 7(0)+3
y = 3
(0,3)
y = 7x + 3
0 = 7x + 3
Subtract 3 from both sides.
-3 = 7x
Divide both sides by 7
-3/7 = x
(-3/7, 0)
Answer:
it's hypotenuse
then
base^2+length ^2=hypotenuse^2
5^2+9^2=106^2
11236
if wrong correct me pls
have a great day ahead
CapTainGeNius
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
This explanation mostly depends on what you're learning right now. The first way would be to convert this matrix to a system of equations like this.
g + t + k = 90
g + 2t - k = 55
-g - t + 3k = 30
Then you solve using normal methods of substitution or elimination. It seems to me that elimination is the quickest method.
g + t + k = 90
-g - t + 3k = 30
____________
0 + 0 + 4k = 120
4k = 120
k = 30
No you can plug this into the first two equations
g + t + (30) = 90
g + t = 60
and
g + 2t - (30) = 55
g + 2t = 85
now use elimination again by multiplying the first equation by -1
g + 2t = 85
-g - t = -60
_________
0 + t = 25
t = 25
Now plug those both back into one of the equations. I'll just do the first one.
g + (25) + (30) = 90
g = 35
Therefore, we know that Ted spent the least amount of time on the computer.
The second method is using matrix reduction and getting the matrix in the row echelon form, therefore solving using the gauss jordan method. If you would like me to go through this instead, please leave a comment.