CCAC in order if you need any more help just ask !
♡ The correct answer should be A.
To help you relate better with people.
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
<span>Because the rest of your doesn't seem to have been written here, I must assume the allusion you are referring to is </span>possibly from this line; Hamlet calls Polonius Jephthah, after the priest in the Old Testament who sacrifices his daughter to God. This allusion suggests <span>Polonius is sacrificing his daughter to trick Hamlet.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Find people that are kind of like you. If you are funny find someone who is funny. If you are more serious find someone like that.
