Answer:
Neither parallel nor perpendicular
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm assuming you meant line k is y = 3x -2. If not, this is wrong.
For this, you need to put both lines in point-slope form, or the form that line k is already in. This means you only need to convert line m.
-2r + 6v = 18
6v = 2r + 18
v = 2/6r + 18/6
v = 1/3r + 3
Now you can answer the question.
To be parallel, lines must have the same slope (but a different y-intercept). 3 and 1/3 are not the same, so the lines are not parallel.
To be perpendicular, one line must have the opposite reciprocal (fraction flipped and + goes to - or - to +) of the other. While 3 is the reciprocal of 1/3, they are both positive, so they are not perpendicular.
To be the same line, the equations must be absolutely identical, which they aren't.
This leaves the last option: neither.
Let me know if you need a more in-depth explanation of anything here! I'm happy to help!
Sorry I don’t get that one
Answer:
108 ft
Correct me, if I am wrong :)
have a great day!
Thanks!
Answer:
Both angles have a measure of 134degrees, y = 27degrees.
Step-by-step explanation:
As per what is given in the problem:
There are 2 parallel lines, both are intersected by a transversal.
Remember the theorem, when two parallel lines are intersected by a transversal, then the alternate exterior angles are congruent.
The is meanse that:
3y + 53 = 7y - 55
Solve using inverse operations:
3y + 53 = 7y - 55
+55 +55
3y + 108 = 7y
-3y -3y
108 = 4y
/4 /4
27 = y
Now, substitute back in to find the value of the angle:
3y + 53
y = 27
3 ( 27 ) + 53
81 + 53
= 134
Since the angles are alternate exterior, they are congruent, hence both angles have a measure of 134degrees.
